FEUS vs. QMAR

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

FEUS (FlexShares ESG & Climate US Large Cap Core Index Fund) and QMAR (FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March) are both exchange-traded funds - FEUS is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Northern Trust ESG & Climate US Large Cap Core Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while QMAR is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by First Trust. FEUS is passively managed, while QMAR is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, FEUS returned 20.68%/yr vs 16.71%/yr for QMAR. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FEUS charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for QMAR.

Performance

FEUS vs. QMAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares ESG & Climate US Large Cap Core Index Fund (FEUS) and FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March (QMAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEUS achieves a 10.99% return, which is significantly lower than QMAR's 13.03% return.

FEUS

• 1D: 0.65%
• 1M: 5.58%
• YTD: 10.99%
• 6M: 11.29%
• 1Y: 27.08%
• 3Y*: 20.68%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QMAR

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: 2.51%
• YTD: 13.03%
• 6M: 13.97%
• 1Y: 23.15%
• 3Y*: 16.71%
• 5Y*: 12.12%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEUS vs. QMAR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FEUS FlexShares ESG & Climate US Large Cap Core Index Fund	10.99%	14.67%	23.10%	25.54%	-19.10%	9.97%
QMAR FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March	13.03%	10.89%	16.11%	35.47%	-16.56%	3.28%

Correlation

The correlation between FEUS and QMAR is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.85
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2021	0.89

The correlation between FEUS and QMAR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

FEUS vs. QMAR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FEUS	QMAR
Technology	35.2%	54.2%
Financial Services	11.9%	0.2%
Communication Services	11.1%	15.5%
Consumer Cyclical	10.6%	12.2%
Healthcare	8.6%	4.2%
Industrials	8.6%	2.8%
Consumer Defensive	4.6%	7.6%
Energy	3.7%	0.6%
Real Estate	2.2%	0.1%
Utilities	1.9%	1.4%
Basic Materials	1.6%	1.2%

Return for Risk

FEUS vs. QMAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEUS

FEUS Risk / Return Rank: 66
FEUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
FEUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
FEUS Omega Ratio Rank: 68
FEUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
FEUS Martin Ratio Rank: 67

QMAR

QMAR Risk / Return Rank: 96
QMAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
QMAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
QMAR Omega Ratio Rank: 97
QMAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
QMAR Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEUS vs. QMAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares ESG & Climate US Large Cap Core Index Fund (FEUS) and FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March (QMAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FEUS	QMAR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.26	3.82	-1.57
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.09	6.00	-2.91
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.92	-0.52
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.85	7.24	-4.39
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.12	52.23	-40.11
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FEUS vs. QMAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEUS Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is lower than the QMAR Sharpe Ratio of 3.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEUS and QMAR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FEUS	QMAR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.26	3.82	-1.57
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.87	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.75	0.91	-0.16

Drawdowns

FEUS vs. QMAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEUS drawdown since its inception was -25.31%, which is greater than QMAR's maximum drawdown of -19.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEUS and QMAR.

Drawdown Indicators

	FEUS	QMAR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.31%	-19.83%	-5.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.55%	-3.21%	-6.34%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.47%	-15.91%	-3.56%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-19.83%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.12%	-0.21%	+0.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.35%	-3.28%	-3.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.24%	0.45%	+1.79%

Volatility

FEUS vs. QMAR - Volatility Comparison

FlexShares ESG & Climate US Large Cap Core Index Fund (FEUS) has a higher volatility of 3.09% compared to FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March (QMAR) at 1.27%. This indicates that FEUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QMAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FEUS	QMAR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.09%	1.27%	+1.82%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.17%	4.85%	+4.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.05%	6.08%	+5.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.00%	13.96%	+3.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.00%	13.85%	+3.15%

FEUS vs. QMAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEUS has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than QMAR's 0.90% expense ratio.

Dividends

FEUS vs. QMAR - Dividend Comparison

FEUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, while QMAR has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FEUS FlexShares ESG & Climate US Large Cap Core Index Fund	0.97%	1.06%	1.15%	1.41%	1.48%	0.36%
QMAR FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FEUS and QMAR in my portfolio?

FEUS and QMAR have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FEUS or QMAR?

FEUS has higher volatility (3.09%) compared to QMAR (1.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEUS dropped -25.31% vs QMAR's -19.83%.

Which ETF is better, FEUS or QMAR?

On 3-year performance, FEUS leads with 20.68% vs 16.71% for QMAR. On fees, FEUS is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, QMAR has been the lower-risk option at 1.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FEUS or QMAR?

Over the 3-year period, FEUS has performed better with a 20.68% return vs 16.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FEUS or QMAR?

FEUS is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for QMAR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FEUS or QMAR?

FEUS has the higher dividend yield at 0.97%, compared with 0.00% for QMAR.

What is the main difference between FEUS and QMAR?

FEUS is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while QMAR is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: FlexShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for FEUS and 0.90% for QMAR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QMAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.82 vs 2.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.