FEUI.L vs. MMS.L
FEUI.L (Fidelity Europe Quality Income UCITS ETF) and MMS.L (Lyxor MSCI EMU Small Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist) are both Europe Equities funds - FEUI.L tracks the MSCI Europe High Div Yld NR EUR while MMS.L tracks the MSCI EMU Small Cap NR EUR. Both are passively managed. FEUI.L charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for MMS.L.
Performance
FEUI.L vs. MMS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FEUI.L
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- 1.67%
- YTD
- 6.44%
- 6M
- 8.73%
- 1Y
- 18.97%
- 3Y*
- 13.09%
- 5Y*
- 7.71%
- 10Y*
- —
MMS.L
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FEUI.L vs. MMS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FEUI.L Fidelity Europe Quality Income UCITS ETF | 6.44% | 23.71% | -0.37% |
MMS.L Lyxor MSCI EMU Small Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FEUI.L vs. MMS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FEUI.L
MMS.L
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Communication Services
Real Estate
Financial Services
FEUI.L
MMS.L
Industrials
FEUI.L
MMS.L
Healthcare
FEUI.L
MMS.L
Technology
FEUI.L
MMS.L
Consumer Cyclical
FEUI.L
MMS.L
Consumer Defensive
FEUI.L
MMS.L
Energy
FEUI.L
MMS.L
Basic Materials
FEUI.L
MMS.L
Utilities
FEUI.L
MMS.L
Communication Services
FEUI.L
MMS.L
Real Estate
FEUI.L
MMS.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FEUI.L vs. MMS.L — Risk / Return Rank
FEUI.L
MMS.L
FEUI.L vs. MMS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Europe Quality Income UCITS ETF (FEUI.L) and Lyxor MSCI EMU Small Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (MMS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FEUI.L | MMS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.97 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.50 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FEUI.L | MMS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.53 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | — | — |
Drawdowns
FEUI.L vs. MMS.L - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FEUI.L | MMS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.32% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.57% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.71% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.06% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.44% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.39% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.91% | — | — |
Volatility
FEUI.L vs. MMS.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FEUI.L | MMS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.76% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.19% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.35% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.14% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.25% | — | — |
FEUI.L vs. MMS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
FEUI.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than MMS.L's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
FEUI.L vs. MMS.L - Dividend Comparison
FEUI.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.54%, while MMS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEUI.L Fidelity Europe Quality Income UCITS ETF | 3.54% | 3.02% | 3.63% | 3.66% | 3.71% | 2.93% | 2.53% | 0.23% |
MMS.L Lyxor MSCI EMU Small Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, FEUI.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FEUI.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for MMS.L.
FEUI.L tracks MSCI Europe High Div Yld NR EUR, while MMS.L tracks MSCI EMU Small Cap NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for FEUI.L and 0.40% for MMS.L.
Find the right allocation for FEUI.L and MMS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer