FEUD.L vs. MMS.L
FEUD.L (First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX® UCITS ETF Class B Shares) and MMS.L (Lyxor MSCI EMU Small Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist) are both Europe Equities funds - FEUD.L tracks the MSCI EMU NR EUR while MMS.L tracks the MSCI EMU Small Cap NR EUR. Both are passively managed. FEUD.L charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for MMS.L.
Performance
FEUD.L vs. MMS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
FEUD.L is traded in GBp, while MMS.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the MMS.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
FEUD.L
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 3.00%
- YTD
- 12.20%
- 6M
- 16.08%
- 1Y
- 33.92%
- 3Y*
- 22.42%
- 5Y*
- 11.70%
- 10Y*
- —
MMS.L
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FEUD.L vs. MMS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FEUD.L First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX® UCITS ETF Class B Shares | 12.20% | 47.89% | 3.30% |
MMS.L Lyxor MSCI EMU Small Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FEUD.L vs. MMS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FEUD.L
MMS.L
Industrials
Energy
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Communication Services
Industrials
FEUD.L
MMS.L
Energy
FEUD.L
MMS.L
Financial Services
FEUD.L
MMS.L
Consumer Cyclical
FEUD.L
MMS.L
Utilities
FEUD.L
MMS.L
Basic Materials
FEUD.L
MMS.L
Real Estate
FEUD.L
MMS.L
Technology
FEUD.L
MMS.L
Consumer Defensive
FEUD.L
MMS.L
Healthcare
FEUD.L
MMS.L
Communication Services
FEUD.L
MMS.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FEUD.L vs. MMS.L — Risk / Return Rank
FEUD.L
MMS.L
FEUD.L vs. MMS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX® UCITS ETF Class B Shares (FEUD.L) and Lyxor MSCI EMU Small Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (MMS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FEUD.L | MMS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.54 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.62 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FEUD.L | MMS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.59 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | — | — |
Drawdowns
FEUD.L vs. MMS.L - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FEUD.L | MMS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.17% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.60% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.03% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.21% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.35% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.69% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.85% | — | — |
Volatility
FEUD.L vs. MMS.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FEUD.L | MMS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.98% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.64% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.52% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.64% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.90% | — | — |
FEUD.L vs. MMS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
FEUD.L has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than MMS.L's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
FEUD.L vs. MMS.L - Dividend Comparison
FEUD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.77%, while MMS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEUD.L First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX® UCITS ETF Class B Shares | 2.77% | 3.05% | 3.72% | 2.76% | 2.50% | 1.94% | 1.01% | 1.75% |
MMS.L Lyxor MSCI EMU Small Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, MMS.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MMS.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for FEUD.L.
FEUD.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR, while MMS.L tracks MSCI EMU Small Cap NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for FEUD.L and 0.40% for MMS.L.
Find the right allocation for FEUD.L and MMS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer