FEUD.L vs. CIBR.L
FEUD.L (First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX® UCITS ETF Class B Shares) and CIBR.L (First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation) are both exchange-traded funds - FEUD.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI EMU NR EUR, while CIBR.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FEUD.L returned 11.70%/yr vs 16.42%/yr for CIBR.L. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FEUD.L charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for CIBR.L.
Performance
FEUD.L vs. CIBR.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
FEUD.L is traded in GBp, while CIBR.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CIBR.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FEUD.L achieves a 12.20% return, which is significantly lower than CIBR.L's 28.84% return.
FEUD.L
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 3.00%
- YTD
- 12.20%
- 6M
- 16.08%
- 1Y
- 33.92%
- 3Y*
- 22.42%
- 5Y*
- 11.70%
- 10Y*
- —
CIBR.L
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- 37.67%
- YTD
- 28.84%
- 6M
- 25.59%
- 1Y
- 26.50%
- 3Y*
- 23.31%
- 5Y*
- 16.42%
- 10Y*
- —
FEUD.L vs. CIBR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEUD.L First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX® UCITS ETF Class B Shares | 12.20% | 47.89% | 4.04% | 10.07% | -9.74% | 13.79% | 14.88% |
CIBR.L First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation | 28.84% | -0.09% | 21.03% | 33.79% | -18.91% | 20.71% | 24.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between FEUD.L and CIBR.L is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2020 | 0.30 |
FEUD.L vs. CIBR.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FEUD.L
CIBR.L
Industrials
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Communication Services
Industrials
FEUD.L
CIBR.L
Energy
FEUD.L
CIBR.L
-
Financial Services
FEUD.L
CIBR.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
FEUD.L
CIBR.L
-
Utilities
FEUD.L
CIBR.L
-
Basic Materials
FEUD.L
CIBR.L
-
Real Estate
FEUD.L
CIBR.L
-
Technology
FEUD.L
CIBR.L
Consumer Defensive
FEUD.L
CIBR.L
-
Healthcare
FEUD.L
CIBR.L
-
Communication Services
FEUD.L
CIBR.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FEUD.L vs. CIBR.L — Risk / Return Rank
FEUD.L
CIBR.L
FEUD.L vs. CIBR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX® UCITS ETF Class B Shares (FEUD.L) and First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation (CIBR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FEUD.L | CIBR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.21 | +0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.54 | 1.09 | +2.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.62 | 2.48 | +10.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FEUD.L | CIBR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.59 | 1.04 | +1.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 | 0.69 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.71 | -0.15 |
Drawdowns
FEUD.L vs. CIBR.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FEUD.L drawdown since its inception was -34.17%, which is greater than CIBR.L's maximum drawdown of -26.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEUD.L and CIBR.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FEUD.L | CIBR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.17% | -26.65% | -7.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.60% | -24.29% | +13.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.03% | -25.48% | +11.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.21% | -26.65% | +3.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.35% | -0.54% | +0.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.69% | -9.33% | +2.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.85% | 10.68% | -7.83% |
Volatility
FEUD.L vs. CIBR.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX® UCITS ETF Class B Shares (FEUD.L) is 3.98%, while First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation (CIBR.L) has a volatility of 11.73%. This indicates that FEUD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CIBR.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FEUD.L | CIBR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.98% | 11.73% | -7.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.64% | 22.44% | -10.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.52% | 25.49% | -10.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.64% | 23.68% | -6.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.90% | 23.77% | -3.87% |
FEUD.L vs. CIBR.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
FEUD.L has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than CIBR.L's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
FEUD.L vs. CIBR.L - Dividend Comparison
FEUD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.77%, while CIBR.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIBR.L First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FEUD.L First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX® UCITS ETF Class B Shares | 2.77% | 3.05% | 3.72% | 2.76% | 2.50% | 1.94% | 1.01% | 1.75% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FEUD.L and CIBR.L have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CIBR.L is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CIBR.L is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for FEUD.L.
FEUD.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while CIBR.L is Technology Equities. FEUD.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR, while CIBR.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for FEUD.L and 0.60% for CIBR.L.
Find the right allocation for FEUD.L and CIBR.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer