PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FEUCX vs. MDGCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FEUCX vs. MDGCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Global Capital Appreciation Fund Class C (FEUCX) and BlackRock Advantage Global Fund, Inc. (MDGCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEUCX achieves a 12.93% return, which is significantly lower than MDGCX's 18.90% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FEUCX having a 12.80% annualized return and MDGCX not far behind at 12.35%.


FEUCX

1D
0.04%
1M
3.58%
YTD
12.93%
6M
13.86%
1Y
28.52%
3Y*
27.21%
5Y*
14.11%
10Y*
12.80%

MDGCX

1D
0.24%
1M
3.95%
YTD
18.90%
6M
19.86%
1Y
38.14%
3Y*
21.91%
5Y*
11.49%
10Y*
12.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEUCX vs. MDGCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FEUCX
Fidelity Advisor Global Capital Appreciation Fund Class C
12.93%16.91%40.54%27.46%-25.23%17.94%23.45%21.86%-18.86%29.38%
MDGCX
BlackRock Advantage Global Fund, Inc.
18.90%23.61%10.87%22.43%-17.94%17.52%15.61%25.54%-11.73%23.41%

Correlation

The correlation between FEUCX and MDGCX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 1998

0.89

The correlation between FEUCX and MDGCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FEUCX vs. MDGCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEUCX
FEUCX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
FEUCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEUCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEUCX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
FEUCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEUCX Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

MDGCX
MDGCX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
MDGCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDGCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDGCX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
MDGCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDGCX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEUCX vs. MDGCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Global Capital Appreciation Fund Class C (FEUCX) and BlackRock Advantage Global Fund, Inc. (MDGCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FEUCXMDGCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.56

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.25

4.85

-2.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.08

22.44

-13.36

FEUCX vs. MDGCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEUCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is lower than the MDGCX Sharpe Ratio of 3.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEUCX and MDGCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FEUCXMDGCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.79

3.11

-1.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

0.71

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

0.72

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.66

-0.26

Drawdowns

FEUCX vs. MDGCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEUCX drawdown since its inception was -60.20%, which is greater than MDGCX's maximum drawdown of -48.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEUCX and MDGCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FEUCXMDGCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.20%

-48.25%

-11.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.11%

-8.07%

-5.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.59%

-21.46%

+1.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.36%

-26.68%

-6.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.13%

-34.87%

+0.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.27%

-0.75%

+0.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.36%

-9.93%

-3.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.24%

1.74%

+1.50%

Volatility

FEUCX vs. MDGCX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Global Capital Appreciation Fund Class C (FEUCX) has a higher volatility of 5.06% compared to BlackRock Advantage Global Fund, Inc. (MDGCX) at 3.80%. This indicates that FEUCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MDGCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FEUCXMDGCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.06%

3.80%

+1.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.37%

10.06%

+3.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.50%

12.61%

+3.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.14%

16.15%

+2.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.67%

17.25%

+1.42%

FEUCX vs. MDGCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEUCX has a 1.92% expense ratio, which is higher than MDGCX's 0.96% expense ratio.


Dividends

FEUCX vs. MDGCX - Dividend Comparison

FEUCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.57%, more than MDGCX's 7.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FEUCX
Fidelity Advisor Global Capital Appreciation Fund Class C
11.57%13.07%19.24%7.72%0.00%9.86%0.00%0.00%12.40%15.33%1.17%0.64%
MDGCX
BlackRock Advantage Global Fund, Inc.
7.49%8.91%7.78%1.42%1.75%16.75%3.77%1.73%4.06%34.82%0.65%5.18%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, FEUCX and MDGCX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FEUCX has higher volatility (5.06%) compared to MDGCX (3.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEUCX dropped -60.20% vs MDGCX's -48.25%.

MDGCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.11 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FEUCX and MDGCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer