PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FETH vs. SETH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FETH vs. SETH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH) and ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF (SETH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FETH achieves a -39.45% return, which is significantly lower than SETH's 40.93% return.


FETH

1D
-5.78%
1M
-23.67%
YTD
-39.45%
6M
-42.77%
1Y
-31.75%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SETH

1D
5.62%
1M
29.74%
YTD
40.93%
6M
46.51%
1Y
-1.33%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FETH vs. SETH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
FETH
Fidelity Ethereum Fund
-39.45%-11.37%-3.61%
SETH
ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF
40.93%-29.41%-13.35%

Correlation

The correlation between FETH and SETH is -1.00, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2024

-1.00

The correlation between FETH and SETH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -1.00 to -1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FETH vs. SETH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FETH
FETH Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
FETH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FETH Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
FETH Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
FETH Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
FETH Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

SETH
SETH Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
SETH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SETH Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
SETH Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
SETH Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
SETH Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FETH vs. SETH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH) and ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF (SETH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FETHSETHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

1.05

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.51

-0.02

-0.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.84

-0.04

-0.80

FETH vs. SETH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FETH Sharpe Ratio is -0.47, which is lower than the SETH Sharpe Ratio of -0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FETH and SETH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FETHSETHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.47

-0.02

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.41

-0.45

+0.03

Drawdowns

FETH vs. SETH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FETH drawdown since its inception was -64.00%, smaller than the maximum SETH drawdown of -80.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FETH and SETH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FETHSETHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.00%

-80.74%

+16.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-62.95%

-56.01%

-6.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-62.95%

-61.29%

-1.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.73%

-54.79%

+22.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

37.82%

35.77%

+2.05%

Volatility

FETH vs. SETH - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH) and ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF (SETH) have volatilities of 9.99% and 9.81%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FETHSETHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.99%

9.81%

+0.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

46.01%

46.07%

-0.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

68.50%

68.54%

-0.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

72.27%

69.53%

+2.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

72.27%

69.53%

+2.74%

FETH vs. SETH - Expense Ratio Comparison

FETH has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than SETH's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

FETH vs. SETH - Dividend Comparison

FETH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SETH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.91%.


PositionTTM202520242023
FETH
Fidelity Ethereum Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SETH
ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF
10.91%7.01%3.44%0.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


FETH and SETH have a correlation of -1.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FETH has higher volatility (9.99%) compared to SETH (9.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FETH dropped -64.00% vs SETH's -80.74%.

On 1-year performance, SETH leads with -1.33% vs -31.75% for FETH. On fees, FETH is cheaper at 0.00% per year. On volatility, SETH has been the lower-risk option at 9.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SETH has performed better with a -1.33% return vs -31.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FETH is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SETH.

SETH has the higher dividend yield at 10.91%, compared with 0.00% for FETH.

FETH tracks Fidelity Ethereum Reference Rate Index, while SETH tracks Bloomberg Galaxy Ethereum (--100%). They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for FETH and 0.95% for SETH.

SETH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.02 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FETH and SETH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer