FETH vs. SETH
FETH (Fidelity Ethereum Fund) and SETH (ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds - FETH tracks the Fidelity Ethereum Reference Rate Index while SETH tracks the Bloomberg Galaxy Ethereum (--100%). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, FETH returned -31.75% vs -1.33% for SETH. At a correlation of -1.00, they often move in opposite directions. FETH charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for SETH.
Performance
FETH vs. SETH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FETH achieves a -39.45% return, which is significantly lower than SETH's 40.93% return.
FETH
- 1D
- -5.78%
- 1M
- -23.67%
- YTD
- -39.45%
- 6M
- -42.77%
- 1Y
- -31.75%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SETH
- 1D
- 5.62%
- 1M
- 29.74%
- YTD
- 40.93%
- 6M
- 46.51%
- 1Y
- -1.33%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FETH vs. SETH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FETH Fidelity Ethereum Fund | -39.45% | -11.37% | -3.61% |
SETH ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF | 40.93% | -29.41% | -13.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between FETH and SETH is -1.00, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2024 | -1.00 |
The correlation between FETH and SETH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -1.00 to -1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FETH vs. SETH — Risk / Return Rank
FETH
SETH
FETH vs. SETH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH) and ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF (SETH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FETH | SETH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.05 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.51 | -0.02 | -0.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.84 | -0.04 | -0.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FETH | SETH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.47 | -0.02 | -0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.41 | -0.45 | +0.03 |
Drawdowns
FETH vs. SETH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FETH drawdown since its inception was -64.00%, smaller than the maximum SETH drawdown of -80.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FETH and SETH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FETH | SETH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.00% | -80.74% | +16.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -62.95% | -56.01% | -6.94% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -62.95% | -61.29% | -1.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.73% | -54.79% | +22.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 37.82% | 35.77% | +2.05% |
Volatility
FETH vs. SETH - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH) and ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF (SETH) have volatilities of 9.99% and 9.81%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FETH | SETH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.99% | 9.81% | +0.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 46.01% | 46.07% | -0.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 68.50% | 68.54% | -0.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 72.27% | 69.53% | +2.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 72.27% | 69.53% | +2.74% |
FETH vs. SETH - Expense Ratio Comparison
FETH has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than SETH's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
FETH vs. SETH - Dividend Comparison
FETH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SETH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.91%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FETH Fidelity Ethereum Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SETH ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF | 10.91% | 7.01% | 3.44% | 0.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FETH and SETH have a correlation of -1.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FETH has higher volatility (9.99%) compared to SETH (9.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FETH dropped -64.00% vs SETH's -80.74%.
On 1-year performance, SETH leads with -1.33% vs -31.75% for FETH. On fees, FETH is cheaper at 0.00% per year. On volatility, SETH has been the lower-risk option at 9.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SETH has performed better with a -1.33% return vs -31.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FETH is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SETH.
SETH has the higher dividend yield at 10.91%, compared with 0.00% for FETH.
FETH tracks Fidelity Ethereum Reference Rate Index, while SETH tracks Bloomberg Galaxy Ethereum (--100%). They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for FETH and 0.95% for SETH.
SETH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.02 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FETH and SETH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer