FETH vs. SBIT
FETH (Fidelity Ethereum Fund) and SBIT (Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds - FETH tracks the Fidelity Ethereum Reference Rate Index while SBIT tracks the Bloomberg Bitcoin Index (-200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, FETH returned -41.37% vs 124.12% for SBIT. At a correlation of -0.82, they often move in opposite directions. FETH charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for SBIT.
Performance
FETH vs. SBIT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FETH achieves a -40.36% return, which is significantly lower than SBIT's 44.00% return.
FETH
- 1D
- -1.12%
- 1M
- 6.51%
- 6M
- -42.88%
- YTD
- -40.36%
- 1Y
- -41.37%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SBIT
- 1D
- 5.38%
- 1M
- 1.44%
- 6M
- 58.27%
- YTD
- 44.00%
- 1Y
- 124.12%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FETH vs. SBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FETH Fidelity Ethereum Fund | -40.36% | -11.37% | -4.68% |
SBIT Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF | 44.00% | -25.11% | -64.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between FETH and SBIT is -0.88, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2024 | -0.82 |
The correlation between FETH and SBIT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.88 to -0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FETH vs. SBIT — Risk / Return Rank
FETH
SBIT
FETH vs. SBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH) and Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FETH | SBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.25 | -0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.61 | 2.60 | -3.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.96 | 5.92 | -6.88 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FETH vs. SBIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FETH drawdown since its inception was -67.94%, smaller than the maximum SBIT drawdown of -91.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FETH and SBIT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FETH | SBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.94% | -91.35% | +23.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -67.94% | -47.94% | -20.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -63.51% | -77.15% | +13.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.52% | -68.83% | +34.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 43.12% | 21.04% | +22.08% |
Volatility
FETH vs. SBIT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH) is 16.12%, while Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT) has a volatility of 22.98%. This indicates that FETH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FETH | SBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.12% | 22.98% | -6.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 46.94% | 68.89% | -21.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 68.30% | 88.51% | -20.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 71.86% | 96.89% | -25.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 71.86% | 96.89% | -25.03% |
FETH vs. SBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison
FETH has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than SBIT's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
FETH vs. SBIT - Dividend Comparison
FETH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SBIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.97%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
FETH Fidelity Ethereum Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SBIT Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF | 3.97% | 0.52% | 1.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FETH and SBIT have a correlation of -0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SBIT has higher volatility (22.98%) compared to FETH (16.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FETH dropped -67.94% vs SBIT's -91.35%.
On 1-year performance, SBIT leads with 124.12% vs -41.37% for FETH. On fees, FETH is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, FETH has been the lower-risk option at 16.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SBIT has performed better with a 124.12% return vs -41.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FETH is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SBIT.
SBIT has the higher dividend yield at 3.97%, compared with 0.00% for FETH.
FETH tracks Fidelity Ethereum Reference Rate Index, while SBIT tracks Bloomberg Bitcoin Index (-200%). They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FETH and 0.95% for SBIT.
SBIT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs -0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FETH and SBIT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer