FETH vs. MSBT
FETH (Fidelity Ethereum Fund) and MSBT (Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust) are both Cryptocurrency funds - FETH tracks the Fidelity Ethereum Reference Rate Index while MSBT tracks the CoinDesk Bitcoin Benchmark 4PM NY Settlement Rate. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FETH charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for MSBT.
Performance
FETH vs. MSBT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FETH
- 1D
- -5.78%
- 1M
- -23.67%
- YTD
- -39.45%
- 6M
- -42.77%
- 1Y
- -31.75%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSBT
- 1D
- -2.70%
- 1M
- -18.41%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FETH vs. MSBT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
FETH Fidelity Ethereum Fund | -18.65% |
MSBT Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust | -8.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between FETH and MSBT is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2026 | 0.91 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FETH vs. MSBT — Risk / Return Rank
FETH
MSBT
FETH vs. MSBT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH) and Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust (MSBT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FETH | MSBT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.51 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.84 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FETH | MSBT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.47 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.41 | -1.33 | +0.92 |
Drawdowns
FETH vs. MSBT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FETH drawdown since its inception was -64.00%, which is greater than MSBT's maximum drawdown of -20.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FETH and MSBT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FETH | MSBT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.00% | -20.25% | -43.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -62.95% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -62.95% | -20.25% | -42.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.73% | -3.91% | -28.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 37.82% | — | — |
Volatility
FETH vs. MSBT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FETH | MSBT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.99% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 46.01% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 68.50% | 32.92% | +35.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 72.27% | 32.92% | +39.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 72.27% | 32.92% | +39.35% |
FETH vs. MSBT - Expense Ratio Comparison
FETH has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than MSBT's 0.14% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FETH vs. MSBT - Dividend Comparison
Neither FETH nor MSBT has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, FETH and MSBT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, FETH is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FETH is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for MSBT.
FETH and MSBT have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
FETH tracks Fidelity Ethereum Reference Rate Index, while MSBT tracks CoinDesk Bitcoin Benchmark 4PM NY Settlement Rate. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Morgan Stanley. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for FETH and 0.14% for MSBT.
Find the right allocation for FETH and MSBT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer