PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FETH vs. MSBT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FETH vs. MSBT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH) and Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust (MSBT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


FETH

1D
-5.78%
1M
-23.67%
YTD
-39.45%
6M
-42.77%
1Y
-31.75%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MSBT

1D
-2.70%
1M
-18.41%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FETH vs. MSBT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FETH and MSBT is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2026

0.91

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FETH vs. MSBT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FETH
FETH Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
FETH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FETH Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
FETH Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
FETH Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
FETH Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

MSBT
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FETH vs. MSBT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH) and Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust (MSBT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FETHMSBTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.84

FETH vs. MSBT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FETHMSBTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.41

-1.33

+0.92

Drawdowns

FETH vs. MSBT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FETH drawdown since its inception was -64.00%, which is greater than MSBT's maximum drawdown of -20.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FETH and MSBT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FETHMSBTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.00%

-20.25%

-43.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-62.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-62.95%

-20.25%

-42.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.73%

-3.91%

-28.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

37.82%

Volatility

FETH vs. MSBT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FETHMSBTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

46.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

68.50%

32.92%

+35.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

72.27%

32.92%

+39.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

72.27%

32.92%

+39.35%

FETH vs. MSBT - Expense Ratio Comparison

FETH has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than MSBT's 0.14% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FETH vs. MSBT - Dividend Comparison

Neither FETH nor MSBT has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, FETH and MSBT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, FETH is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FETH is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for MSBT.

FETH and MSBT have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

FETH tracks Fidelity Ethereum Reference Rate Index, while MSBT tracks CoinDesk Bitcoin Benchmark 4PM NY Settlement Rate. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Morgan Stanley. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for FETH and 0.14% for MSBT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FETH and MSBT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer