FETH vs. CBOO
FETH (Fidelity Ethereum Fund) and CBOO (Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - October) are both exchange-traded funds - FETH is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Fidelity Ethereum Reference Rate Index, while CBOO is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Calamos. FETH is passively managed, while CBOO is actively managed. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FETH charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for CBOO.
Performance
FETH vs. CBOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FETH achieves a -44.11% return, which is significantly lower than CBOO's 0.10% return.
FETH
- 1D
- -4.17%
- 1M
- -19.46%
- YTD
- -44.11%
- 6M
- -44.07%
- 1Y
- -28.45%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CBOO
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.16%
- YTD
- 0.10%
- 6M
- 0.02%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FETH vs. CBOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FETH Fidelity Ethereum Fund | -44.11% | -37.27% |
CBOO Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - October | 0.10% | -1.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between FETH and CBOO is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2025 | 0.68 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FETH vs. CBOO — Risk / Return Rank
FETH
CBOO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FETH vs. CBOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH) and Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - October (CBOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FETH | CBOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.42 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.70 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FETH vs. CBOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FETH drawdown since its inception was -67.57%, which is greater than CBOO's maximum drawdown of -2.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FETH and CBOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FETH | CBOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.57% | -2.34% | -65.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -67.57% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -65.81% | -1.58% | -64.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.69% | -1.60% | -32.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 40.48% | — | — |
Volatility
FETH vs. CBOO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FETH | CBOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.78% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 46.89% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 69.15% | 2.07% | +67.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 72.38% | 2.07% | +70.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 72.38% | 2.07% | +70.31% |
FETH vs. CBOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
FETH has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than CBOO's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
FETH vs. CBOO - Dividend Comparison
FETH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CBOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CBOO Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - October | 0.57% | 0.57% |
FETH Fidelity Ethereum Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FETH and CBOO have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FETH is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FETH is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for CBOO.
CBOO has the higher dividend yield at 0.57%, compared with 0.00% for FETH.
FETH is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while CBOO is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Calamos. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FETH and 0.69% for CBOO.
Find the right allocation for FETH and CBOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer