PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FESIX vs. AWP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FESIX vs. AWP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity SAI Real Estate Index Fund (FESIX) and abrdn Global Premier Properties Fund (AWP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FESIX achieves a 7.52% return, which is significantly higher than AWP's 3.18% return.


FESIX

1D
0.37%
1M
-0.91%
YTD
7.52%
6M
6.51%
1Y
9.76%
3Y*
8.95%
5Y*
1.99%
10Y*

AWP

1D
-0.44%
1M
-3.34%
YTD
3.18%
6M
2.11%
1Y
7.44%
3Y*
12.51%
5Y*
-0.49%
10Y*
6.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FESIX vs. AWP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FESIX
Fidelity SAI Real Estate Index Fund
7.52%3.09%4.80%11.83%-26.47%40.61%-11.10%23.06%-4.95%2.81%
AWP
abrdn Global Premier Properties Fund
3.18%12.43%12.23%12.58%-37.13%40.41%-10.29%42.52%-18.47%45.19%

Correlation

The correlation between FESIX and AWP is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017

0.65

The correlation between FESIX and AWP shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (1 year) to 0.75 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FESIX vs. AWP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FESIX
FESIX Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
FESIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FESIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
FESIX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
FESIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
FESIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

AWP
AWP Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
AWP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AWP Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
AWP Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
AWP Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
AWP Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FESIX vs. AWP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity SAI Real Estate Index Fund (FESIX) and abrdn Global Premier Properties Fund (AWP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FESIXAWPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.10

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.14

0.53

+0.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.56

2.15

+1.41

FESIX vs. AWP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FESIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.73, which is higher than the AWP Sharpe Ratio of 0.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FESIX and AWP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FESIXAWPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

0.53

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

-0.02

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.18

0.06

+0.12

Drawdowns

FESIX vs. AWP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FESIX drawdown since its inception was -44.22%, smaller than the maximum AWP drawdown of -85.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FESIX and AWP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FESIXAWPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.22%

-85.93%

+41.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.42%

-14.14%

+5.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.48%

-23.09%

+5.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.51%

-43.93%

+9.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.48%

-7.85%

+3.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.39%

-27.39%

+16.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.69%

3.46%

-0.77%

Volatility

FESIX vs. AWP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity SAI Real Estate Index Fund (FESIX) is 3.81%, while abrdn Global Premier Properties Fund (AWP) has a volatility of 4.42%. This indicates that FESIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AWP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FESIXAWPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.81%

4.42%

-0.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.31%

11.12%

-1.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.16%

14.00%

-0.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.93%

22.16%

-3.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.74%

23.63%

-1.89%

FESIX vs. AWP - Expense Ratio Comparison

FESIX has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than AWP's 1.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

FESIX vs. AWP - Dividend Comparison

FESIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.87%, less than AWP's 12.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AWP
abrdn Global Premier Properties Fund
12.74%12.50%12.44%12.37%12.31%7.02%9.13%8.49%12.05%8.90%11.70%10.40%
FESIX
Fidelity SAI Real Estate Index Fund
2.87%3.09%52.40%3.87%55.39%5.01%2.71%3.78%3.15%2.21%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FESIX and AWP have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AWP has higher volatility (4.42%) compared to FESIX (3.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FESIX dropped -44.22% vs AWP's -85.93%.

FESIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.73 vs 0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FESIX and AWP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer