AWP vs. SPHY
Compare and contrast key facts about abrdn Global Premier Properties Fund (AWP) and SPDR Portfolio High Yield Bond ETF (SPHY).
AWP is an actively managed fund by abrdn. It was launched on Feb 13, 2007. SPHY is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the ICE BofAML US High Yield Index. It was launched on Jun 18, 2012.
Performance
AWP vs. SPHY - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AWP vs. SPHY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AWP abrdn Global Premier Properties Fund | -1.11% | 12.43% | 12.23% | 12.58% | -37.13% | 40.41% | -10.29% | 42.52% | -18.47% | 44.91% |
SPHY SPDR Portfolio High Yield Bond ETF | -0.32% | 8.59% | 8.54% | 12.81% | -10.57% | 5.61% | 6.65% | 13.16% | -3.35% | 7.35% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AWP achieves a -1.11% return, which is significantly lower than SPHY's -0.32% return. Over the past 10 years, AWP has outperformed SPHY with an annualized return of 6.45%, while SPHY has yielded a comparatively lower 5.29% annualized return.
AWP
- 1D
- 2.60%
- 1M
- -11.08%
- YTD
- -1.11%
- 6M
- -1.36%
- 1Y
- 7.31%
- 3Y*
- 8.91%
- 5Y*
- 1.35%
- 10Y*
- 6.45%
SPHY
- 1D
- 1.00%
- 1M
- -1.02%
- YTD
- -0.32%
- 6M
- 0.94%
- 1Y
- 7.11%
- 3Y*
- 8.40%
- 5Y*
- 4.31%
- 10Y*
- 5.29%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AWP vs. SPHY - Expense Ratio Comparison
AWP has a 1.19% expense ratio, which is higher than SPHY's 0.10% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
AWP vs. SPHY — Risk / Return Rank
AWP
SPHY
AWP vs. SPHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Global Premier Properties Fund (AWP) and SPDR Portfolio High Yield Bond ETF (SPHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AWP | SPHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.39 | 1.30 | -0.91 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.66 | 1.92 | -1.27 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.31 | -0.21 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.65 | 1.76 | -1.11 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.66 | 9.23 | -6.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AWP | SPHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 | 1.30 | -0.91 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 | 0.61 | -0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 | 0.67 | -0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.05 | 0.62 | -0.57 |
Correlation
The correlation between AWP and SPHY is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
AWP vs. SPHY - Dividend Comparison
AWP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.03%, more than SPHY's 7.39% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AWP abrdn Global Premier Properties Fund | 13.03% | 12.50% | 12.44% | 12.37% | 12.31% | 7.02% | 9.13% | 8.49% | 12.05% | 8.90% | 11.70% | 10.40% |
SPHY SPDR Portfolio High Yield Bond ETF | 7.39% | 7.38% | 7.80% | 7.30% | 6.47% | 5.13% | 5.63% | 5.73% | 4.09% | 4.41% | 4.27% | 4.29% |
Drawdowns
AWP vs. SPHY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AWP drawdown since its inception was -85.93%, which is greater than SPHY's maximum drawdown of -21.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AWP and SPHY.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AWP | SPHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.93% | -21.97% | -63.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.21% | -4.07% | -10.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.93% | -15.29% | -28.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.95% | -21.97% | -31.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.68% | -1.31% | -10.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.60% | -2.32% | -25.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.49% | 0.78% | +2.71% |
Volatility
AWP vs. SPHY - Volatility Comparison
abrdn Global Premier Properties Fund (AWP) has a higher volatility of 6.49% compared to SPDR Portfolio High Yield Bond ETF (SPHY) at 2.23%. This indicates that AWP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPHY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AWP | SPHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.49% | 2.23% | +4.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.62% | 2.87% | +7.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.84% | 5.49% | +13.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.19% | 7.15% | +15.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.59% | 7.97% | +15.62% |