PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FESD.DE vs. IS02.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FESD.DE vs. IS02.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Fidelity Sustainable USD EM Bond UCITS ETF (FESD.DE) and iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS02.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FESD.DE achieves a 3.41% return, which is significantly higher than IS02.DE's 2.97% return.


FESD.DE

1D
-0.09%
1M
1.35%
YTD
3.41%
6M
3.08%
1Y
9.14%
3Y*
5.13%
5Y*
1.89%
10Y*

IS02.DE

1D
0.11%
1M
1.71%
YTD
2.97%
6M
2.72%
1Y
9.38%
3Y*
6.78%
5Y*
2.88%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FESD.DE vs. IS02.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FESD.DE
Fidelity Sustainable USD EM Bond UCITS ETF
3.41%0.21%8.73%4.67%-13.30%6.35%
IS02.DE
iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF (Acc)
2.97%1.10%11.83%6.71%-13.12%7.31%

Correlation

The correlation between FESD.DE and IS02.DE is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 30, 2021

0.76

The correlation between FESD.DE and IS02.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FESD.DE vs. IS02.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FESD.DE
FESD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
FESD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FESD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
FESD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
FESD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
FESD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

IS02.DE
IS02.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
IS02.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IS02.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
IS02.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
IS02.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
IS02.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FESD.DE vs. IS02.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Sustainable USD EM Bond UCITS ETF (FESD.DE) and iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS02.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FESD.DEIS02.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.30

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.46

3.11

-0.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.56

8.98

-2.42

FESD.DE vs. IS02.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FESD.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is comparable to the IS02.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FESD.DE and IS02.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FESD.DEIS02.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.40

1.57

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

0.33

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.19

0.27

-0.09

Drawdowns

FESD.DE vs. IS02.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FESD.DE drawdown since its inception was -16.01%, roughly equal to the maximum IS02.DE drawdown of -16.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FESD.DE and IS02.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FESD.DEIS02.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.01%

-16.21%

+0.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.71%

-3.00%

-0.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.34%

-12.85%

+0.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.01%

-16.21%

+0.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.59%

0.00%

-0.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.16%

-5.92%

-1.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.39%

1.04%

+0.35%

Volatility

FESD.DE vs. IS02.DE - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Sustainable USD EM Bond UCITS ETF (FESD.DE) has a higher volatility of 2.28% compared to iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS02.DE) at 1.19%. This indicates that FESD.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IS02.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FESD.DEIS02.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.28%

1.19%

+1.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.57%

3.97%

+0.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.51%

5.94%

+0.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.80%

8.53%

+0.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.70%

8.34%

+0.36%

FESD.DE vs. IS02.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FESD.DE and IS02.DE have an expense ratio of 0.45%.


Dividends

FESD.DE vs. IS02.DE - Dividend Comparison

FESD.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.69%, while IS02.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
FESD.DE
Fidelity Sustainable USD EM Bond UCITS ETF
6.69%5.90%5.86%5.43%4.80%2.01%
IS02.DE
iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FESD.DE and IS02.DE have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.45% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FESD.DE and IS02.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.45% per year.

FESD.DE tracks Fidelity Sustainable USD EM Bond, while IS02.DE tracks JP Morgan EMBI Global Core. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and iShares.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FESD.DE and IS02.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer