FERIX vs. IASMX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class I (FERIX) and Guinness Atkinson Asia Focus Fund (IASMX).
FERIX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Jun 15, 1999. IASMX is managed by Guinness Atkinson. It was launched on Apr 28, 1996.
Performance
FERIX vs. IASMX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FERIX vs. IASMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FERIX Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class I | 0.92% | 37.04% | 20.95% | 13.84% | -30.60% | -14.83% | 72.97% | 31.02% | -14.87% | 45.94% |
IASMX Guinness Atkinson Asia Focus Fund | -1.19% | 29.64% | 4.38% | 5.95% | -28.04% | -6.46% | 26.02% | 29.32% | -17.58% | 47.12% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FERIX achieves a 0.92% return, which is significantly higher than IASMX's -1.19% return. Over the past 10 years, FERIX has outperformed IASMX with an annualized return of 12.65%, while IASMX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.59% annualized return.
FERIX
- 1D
- -1.11%
- 1M
- -12.52%
- YTD
- 0.92%
- 6M
- 2.47%
- 1Y
- 34.26%
- 3Y*
- 20.82%
- 5Y*
- 2.42%
- 10Y*
- 12.65%
IASMX
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- -8.38%
- YTD
- -1.19%
- 6M
- -2.18%
- 1Y
- 26.03%
- 3Y*
- 9.95%
- 5Y*
- -1.62%
- 10Y*
- 7.59%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FERIX vs. IASMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FERIX has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is lower than IASMX's 1.98% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FERIX vs. IASMX — Risk / Return Rank
FERIX
IASMX
FERIX vs. IASMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class I (FERIX) and Guinness Atkinson Asia Focus Fund (IASMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FERIX | IASMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.65 | 1.26 | +0.38 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.18 | 1.80 | +0.38 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.25 | +0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.27 | 1.49 | +0.78 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.22 | 6.38 | +1.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FERIX | IASMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.65 | 1.26 | +0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 | -0.08 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 | 0.37 | +0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.16 | +0.20 |
Correlation
The correlation between FERIX and IASMX is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FERIX vs. IASMX - Dividend Comparison
FERIX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IASMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.01%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FERIX Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class I | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 12.49% | 6.58% | 5.30% | 6.70% | 0.03% | 1.29% | 0.82% |
IASMX Guinness Atkinson Asia Focus Fund | 7.01% | 6.92% | 1.51% | 1.16% | 3.40% | 9.14% | 5.78% | 6.61% | 12.82% | 0.90% | 1.44% | 1.18% |
Drawdowns
FERIX vs. IASMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FERIX drawdown since its inception was -60.82%, smaller than the maximum IASMX drawdown of -76.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FERIX and IASMX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FERIX | IASMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.82% | -76.53% | +15.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.53% | -15.27% | +1.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.29% | -49.08% | -4.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.71% | -52.51% | -5.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.53% | -18.06% | +4.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.22% | -33.36% | +15.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.73% | 3.57% | +0.16% |
Volatility
FERIX vs. IASMX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class I (FERIX) has a higher volatility of 9.61% compared to Guinness Atkinson Asia Focus Fund (IASMX) at 6.81%. This indicates that FERIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IASMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FERIX | IASMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.61% | 6.81% | +2.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.64% | 12.32% | +2.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.29% | 20.10% | +0.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.55% | 21.22% | +1.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.70% | 20.61% | +0.09% |