PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FERGX vs. SAEMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FERGX vs. SAEMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity SAI Emerging Markets Index Fund (FERGX) and SA Emerging Markets Value Fund (SAEMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FERGX having a 27.01% return and SAEMX slightly lower at 25.99%.


FERGX

1D
-1.10%
1M
3.09%
YTD
27.01%
6M
29.07%
1Y
52.53%
3Y*
23.92%
5Y*
7.24%
10Y*

SAEMX

1D
-1.57%
1M
4.61%
YTD
25.99%
6M
27.56%
1Y
47.79%
3Y*
23.17%
5Y*
10.64%
10Y*
10.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FERGX vs. SAEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FERGX
Fidelity SAI Emerging Markets Index Fund
27.01%33.86%6.59%9.41%-20.19%-3.05%17.46%18.22%-14.52%33.62%
SAEMX
SA Emerging Markets Value Fund
25.99%29.21%5.47%15.72%-11.61%10.51%0.88%8.05%-12.11%30.14%

Correlation

The correlation between FERGX and SAEMX is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017

0.70

Over the past year, the correlation between FERGX and SAEMX has dropped to 0.49 - well below their long-term average of 0.70, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FERGX vs. SAEMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FERGX
FERGX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
FERGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FERGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
FERGX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
FERGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
FERGX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

SAEMX
SAEMX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
SAEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SAEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
SAEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
SAEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
SAEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FERGX vs. SAEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity SAI Emerging Markets Index Fund (FERGX) and SA Emerging Markets Value Fund (SAEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FERGXSAEMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.56

1.63

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.06

4.52

-0.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.99

16.74

-0.74

FERGX vs. SAEMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FERGX Sharpe Ratio is 3.02, which is comparable to the SAEMX Sharpe Ratio of 3.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FERGX and SAEMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FERGXSAEMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.02

3.43

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

0.73

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.21

+0.34

Drawdowns

FERGX vs. SAEMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FERGX drawdown since its inception was -39.27%, smaller than the maximum SAEMX drawdown of -63.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FERGX and SAEMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FERGXSAEMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.27%

-63.08%

+23.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.32%

-12.22%

-1.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.20%

-17.80%

+1.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.97%

-25.85%

-11.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.10%

-1.63%

-0.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.32%

-17.21%

+2.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.37%

3.14%

+0.23%

Volatility

FERGX vs. SAEMX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity SAI Emerging Markets Index Fund (FERGX) has a higher volatility of 7.78% compared to SA Emerging Markets Value Fund (SAEMX) at 5.86%. This indicates that FERGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SAEMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FERGXSAEMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.78%

5.86%

+1.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.54%

13.47%

+2.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.96%

16.14%

+1.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.25%

14.95%

+2.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.99%

15.54%

+2.45%

FERGX vs. SAEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FERGX has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than SAEMX's 1.24% expense ratio.


Dividends

FERGX vs. SAEMX - Dividend Comparison

FERGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.10%, less than SAEMX's 2.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FERGX
Fidelity SAI Emerging Markets Index Fund
2.10%2.67%2.40%2.67%2.51%2.90%1.49%2.49%2.58%0.58%0.00%0.00%
SAEMX
SA Emerging Markets Value Fund
2.73%3.43%4.37%4.07%3.54%2.86%1.76%2.18%1.78%1.28%1.23%1.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


FERGX and SAEMX have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FERGX has higher volatility (7.78%) compared to SAEMX (5.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FERGX dropped -39.27% vs SAEMX's -63.08%.

SAEMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.43 vs 3.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FERGX and SAEMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer