PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
FEQT.NEO vs. RULE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

FEQT.NEO vs. RULE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

FEQT.NEO (Fidelity All-in-One Equity ETF Fund) and RULE (Adaptive Core ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, FEQT.NEO returned 25.84% vs 53.68% for RULE. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FEQT.NEO charges 0.43%/yr vs 1.10%/yr for RULE.

Performance

FEQT.NEO vs. RULE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Fidelity All-in-One Equity ETF Fund (FEQT.NEO) and Adaptive Core ETF (RULE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FEQT.NEO is traded in CAD, while RULE is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the RULE values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEQT.NEO achieves a 10.90% return, which is significantly lower than RULE's 46.17% return.

FEQT.NEO

1D
0.54%
1M
4.10%
YTD
10.90%
6M
10.77%
1Y
25.84%
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—

RULE

1D
-0.73%
1M
19.68%
YTD
46.17%
6M
44.73%
1Y
53.68%
3Y*
21.41%
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEQT.NEO vs. RULE - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024
FEQT.NEO
Fidelity All-in-One Equity ETF Fund		10.90%19.42%14.08%
RULE
Adaptive Core ETF		46.17%-0.20%7.37%

Correlation

The correlation between FEQT.NEO and RULE is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2024

0.71

The correlation between FEQT.NEO and RULE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Fidelity All-in-One Equity ETF Fund

Adaptive Core ETF

Often compared with FEQT.NEO:
FEQT.NEO vs. XEQT.TOFEQT.NEO vs. VEQT.TOFEQT.NEO vs. ZEQT.TOFEQT.NEO vs. VFV.TOFEQT.NEO vs. TEQT.TOFEQT.NEO vs. HEQL.TOFEQT.NEO vs. XMTM.TO
Often compared with RULE:
RULE vs. GAARULE vs. AOARULE vs. TSPXRULE vs. PBLRULE vs. HNDLRULE vs. RAARULE vs. AVMA

Return for Risk

FEQT.NEO vs. RULE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
FEQT.NEO
FEQT.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
FEQT.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEQT.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEQT.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
FEQT.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEQT.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
RULE
RULE Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
RULE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RULE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
RULE Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
RULE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
RULE Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEQT.NEO vs. RULE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity All-in-One Equity ETF Fund (FEQT.NEO) and Adaptive Core ETF (RULE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

FEQT.NEORULEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.36
2.71

-0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.30
3.69

-0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.48

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.12

4.88

-1.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.53

18.38

-4.85

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FEQT.NEO vs. RULE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEQT.NEO Sharpe Ratio is 2.36, which is comparable to the RULE Sharpe Ratio of 2.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEQT.NEO and RULE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

FEQT.NEORULEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.36

2.71

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.79

0.65

+1.14

Drawdowns

FEQT.NEO vs. RULE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEQT.NEO drawdown since its inception was -13.24%, smaller than the maximum RULE drawdown of -24.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEQT.NEO and RULE.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

FEQT.NEORULEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.24%

-24.49%

+11.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.31%

-11.06%

+2.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

—

-19.42%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.48%

-0.73%

+0.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.45%

-11.28%

+9.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.91%

2.93%

-1.02%

Volatility

FEQT.NEO vs. RULE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity All-in-One Equity ETF Fund (FEQT.NEO) is 3.90%, while Adaptive Core ETF (RULE) has a volatility of 9.49%. This indicates that FEQT.NEO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RULE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

FEQT.NEORULEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.90%

9.49%

-5.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.89%

17.17%

-8.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.02%

19.90%

-8.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.44%

14.49%

-2.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.44%

14.49%

-2.05%

FEQT.NEO vs. RULE - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEQT.NEO has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is lower than RULE's 1.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

FEQT.NEO vs. RULE - Dividend Comparison

FEQT.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, while RULE has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM2025202420232022
FEQT.NEO
Fidelity All-in-One Equity ETF Fund		0.82%0.91%0.91%0.00%0.00%
RULE
Adaptive Core ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%2.01%0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

FEQT.NEO and RULE have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FEQT.NEO is cheaper at 0.43% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FEQT.NEO is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 1.10% for RULE.

They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Mohr Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.43% for FEQT.NEO and 1.10% for RULE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FEQT.NEO and RULE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer