PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FEQT.NEO vs. IBIT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FEQT.NEO vs. IBIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Fidelity All-in-One Equity ETF Fund (FEQT.NEO) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FEQT.NEO vs. IBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
FEQT.NEO
Fidelity All-in-One Equity ETF Fund
2.28%18.36%13.06%
IBIT
iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF
-21.19%-10.70%55.07%
Different Trading Currencies

FEQT.NEO is traded in CAD, while IBIT is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IBIT values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEQT.NEO achieves a 2.28% return, which is significantly higher than IBIT's -21.57% return.


FEQT.NEO

1D
0.95%
1M
-3.56%
YTD
2.28%
6M
3.52%
1Y
18.45%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IBIT

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.30%
YTD
-21.57%
6M
-42.55%
1Y
-22.65%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FEQT.NEO vs. IBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEQT.NEO has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIT's 0.25% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FEQT.NEO vs. IBIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEQT.NEO
FEQT.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
FEQT.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEQT.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEQT.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
FEQT.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEQT.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

IBIT
IBIT Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
IBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEQT.NEO vs. IBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity All-in-One Equity ETF Fund (FEQT.NEO) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FEQT.NEOIBITDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.23

-0.51

+1.74

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.73

-0.48

+2.22

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

0.94

+0.32

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.65

-0.41

+2.06

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.22

-0.87

+8.09

FEQT.NEO vs. IBIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEQT.NEO Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is higher than the IBIT Sharpe Ratio of -0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEQT.NEO and IBIT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FEQT.NEOIBITDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.23

-0.51

+1.74

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.37

0.40

+0.97

Correlation

The correlation between FEQT.NEO and IBIT is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

FEQT.NEO vs. IBIT - Dividend Comparison

Neither FEQT.NEO nor IBIT has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

FEQT.NEO vs. IBIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEQT.NEO drawdown since its inception was -13.24%, smaller than the maximum IBIT drawdown of -50.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEQT.NEO and IBIT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FEQT.NEOIBITDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.24%

-49.36%

+36.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.15%

-49.36%

+38.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.10%

-45.80%

+41.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.49%

-14.18%

+12.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.54%

23.27%

-20.73%

Volatility

FEQT.NEO vs. IBIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity All-in-One Equity ETF Fund (FEQT.NEO) is 5.65%, while iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) has a volatility of 12.85%. This indicates that FEQT.NEO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FEQT.NEOIBITDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.65%

12.85%

-7.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.38%

36.37%

-26.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.04%

44.85%

-29.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.27%

50.57%

-37.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.27%

50.57%

-37.30%