PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FEQT.NEO vs. EAOK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FEQT.NEO vs. EAOK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Fidelity All-in-One Equity ETF Fund (FEQT.NEO) and iShares ESG Aware Conservative Allocation ETF (EAOK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FEQT.NEO is traded in CAD, while EAOK is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the EAOK values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEQT.NEO achieves a 11.50% return, which is significantly higher than EAOK's 7.98% return.


FEQT.NEO

1D
0.22%
1M
1.03%
YTD
11.50%
6M
10.71%
1Y
25.59%
3Y*
24.39%
5Y*
10Y*

EAOK

1D
0.35%
1M
3.46%
YTD
7.98%
6M
7.66%
1Y
14.68%
3Y*
11.56%
5Y*
6.15%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEQT.NEO vs. EAOK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
FEQT.NEO
Fidelity All-in-One Equity ETF Fund
11.50%19.42%29.43%17.95%-3.63%
EAOK
iShares ESG Aware Conservative Allocation ETF
7.98%6.38%14.77%7.51%-5.24%

Correlation

The correlation between FEQT.NEO and EAOK is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 20, 2022

0.41

The correlation between FEQT.NEO and EAOK shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (all time) to 0.51 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FEQT.NEO vs. EAOK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEQT.NEO
FEQT.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
FEQT.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEQT.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEQT.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
FEQT.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEQT.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

EAOK
EAOK Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
EAOK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EAOK Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
EAOK Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
EAOK Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
EAOK Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEQT.NEO vs. EAOK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity All-in-One Equity ETF Fund (FEQT.NEO) and iShares ESG Aware Conservative Allocation ETF (EAOK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FEQT.NEOEAOKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.35

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.09

3.63

-0.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.08

10.70

+2.38

FEQT.NEO vs. EAOK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEQT.NEO Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is comparable to the EAOK Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEQT.NEO and EAOK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FEQT.NEO vs. EAOK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEQT.NEO drawdown since its inception was -15.98%, roughly equal to the maximum EAOK drawdown of -15.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEQT.NEO and EAOK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FEQT.NEOEAOKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.98%

-15.40%

-0.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.31%

-4.06%

-4.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.24%

-7.71%

-5.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.96%

0.00%

-0.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.86%

-3.97%

+1.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.96%

1.38%

+0.58%

Volatility

FEQT.NEO vs. EAOK - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity All-in-One Equity ETF Fund (FEQT.NEO) has a higher volatility of 5.14% compared to iShares ESG Aware Conservative Allocation ETF (EAOK) at 2.69%. This indicates that FEQT.NEO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EAOK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FEQT.NEOEAOKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.14%

2.69%

+2.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.99%

5.82%

+4.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.97%

7.23%

+4.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.60%

9.40%

+3.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.60%

9.34%

+3.26%

FEQT.NEO vs. EAOK - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEQT.NEO has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is higher than EAOK's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

FEQT.NEO vs. EAOK - Dividend Comparison

FEQT.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%, less than EAOK's 3.17% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
EAOK
iShares ESG Aware Conservative Allocation ETF
3.17%3.18%3.15%2.80%2.27%1.19%1.00%
FEQT.NEO
Fidelity All-in-One Equity ETF Fund
0.81%0.91%0.91%1.33%1.23%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FEQT.NEO and EAOK have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EAOK is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EAOK is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for FEQT.NEO.

They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.43% for FEQT.NEO and 0.18% for EAOK.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FEQT.NEO and EAOK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer