FEQT.NEO vs. BAMY

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity All-in-One Equity ETF Fund (FEQT.NEO) and Brookstone Yield ETF (BAMY).

FEQT.NEO and BAMY are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FEQT.NEO is an actively managed fund by Fidelity. It was launched on Jan 20, 2022. BAMY is an actively managed fund by Brookstone. It was launched on Sep 27, 2023.

Performance

FEQT.NEO vs. BAMY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Fidelity All-in-One Equity ETF Fund (FEQT.NEO) and Brookstone Yield ETF (BAMY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FEQT.NEO vs. BAMY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FEQT.NEO Fidelity All-in-One Equity ETF Fund	2.28%	18.36%	13.06%
BAMY Brookstone Yield ETF	1.00%	7.75%	11.48%

Different Trading Currencies

FEQT.NEO is traded in CAD, while BAMY is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BAMY values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEQT.NEO achieves a 2.28% return, which is significantly higher than BAMY's 1.00% return.

FEQT.NEO

• 1D: 0.95%
• 1M: -3.56%
• YTD: 2.28%
• 6M: 3.52%
• 1Y: 18.45%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BAMY

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: 0.74%
• YTD: 1.00%
• 6M: 2.43%
• 1Y: 9.51%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEQT.NEO vs. BAMY - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEQT.NEO has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is lower than BAMY's 1.48% expense ratio.

BAMY

Brookstone Yield ETF

FEQT.NEO

Fidelity All-in-One Equity ETF Fund

Return for Risk

FEQT.NEO vs. BAMY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEQT.NEO

FEQT.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 67
FEQT.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
FEQT.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
FEQT.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 68
FEQT.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
FEQT.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 68

BAMY

BAMY Risk / Return Rank: 90
BAMY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
BAMY Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
BAMY Omega Ratio Rank: 94
BAMY Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
BAMY Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEQT.NEO vs. BAMY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity All-in-One Equity ETF Fund (FEQT.NEO) and Brookstone Yield ETF (BAMY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FEQT.NEO	BAMY	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.23	1.19	+0.04
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.73	1.62	+0.12
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.24	+0.02
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.65	1.55	+0.10
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.22	5.34	+1.88
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FEQT.NEO vs. BAMY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEQT.NEO Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is comparable to the BAMY Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEQT.NEO and BAMY, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FEQT.NEO	BAMY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.23	1.19	+0.04
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.37	1.80	-0.43

Correlation

The correlation between FEQT.NEO and BAMY is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

FEQT.NEO vs. BAMY - Dividend Comparison

FEQT.NEO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BAMY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.03%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023
FEQT.NEO Fidelity All-in-One Equity ETF Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
BAMY Brookstone Yield ETF	8.03%	7.16%	8.20%	1.96%

Drawdowns

FEQT.NEO vs. BAMY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEQT.NEO drawdown since its inception was -13.24%, which is greater than BAMY's maximum drawdown of -8.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEQT.NEO and BAMY.

Drawdown Indicators

	FEQT.NEO	BAMY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.24%	-6.03%	-7.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.15%	-4.60%	-6.55%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.10%	-1.23%	-2.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.49%	-0.54%	-0.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.54%	0.85%	+1.69%

Volatility

FEQT.NEO vs. BAMY - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity All-in-One Equity ETF Fund (FEQT.NEO) has a higher volatility of 5.65% compared to Brookstone Yield ETF (BAMY) at 2.06%. This indicates that FEQT.NEO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAMY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FEQT.NEO	BAMY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.65%	2.06%	+3.59%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.38%	4.65%	+4.73%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.04%	8.03%	+7.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.27%	7.11%	+6.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.27%	7.11%	+6.16%