PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FEQD.L vs. FLXD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FEQD.L vs. FLXD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Fidelity Europe Quality Income UCITS ETF (FEQD.L) and Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF (FLXD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEQD.L achieves a 7.24% return, which is significantly lower than FLXD.L's 9.29% return.


FEQD.L

1D
0.66%
1M
3.00%
YTD
7.24%
6M
8.98%
1Y
19.46%
3Y*
13.43%
5Y*
7.92%
10Y*

FLXD.L

1D
0.49%
1M
-0.03%
YTD
9.29%
6M
12.43%
1Y
20.53%
3Y*
19.08%
5Y*
13.18%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEQD.L vs. FLXD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FEQD.L
Fidelity Europe Quality Income UCITS ETF
7.24%23.82%1.33%15.49%-11.08%17.26%2.85%21.96%-7.38%-0.52%
FLXD.L
Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF
9.29%31.50%8.51%9.23%6.26%10.54%1.48%13.79%-11.21%-2.25%

Correlation

The correlation between FEQD.L and FLXD.L is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2017

0.75

Over the past year, the correlation between FEQD.L and FLXD.L has dropped to 0.53 - well below their long-term average of 0.75, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FEQD.L vs. FLXD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FEQD.L
FLXD.L

Financial Services

24.3%
35.8%

Industrials

19.8%
7.9%

Healthcare

12.8%
10.3%

Technology

9.1%
0.7%

Consumer Cyclical

7.9%
1.0%

Consumer Defensive

6.7%
4.6%

Energy

5.4%
11.6%

Basic Materials

4.9%
5.2%

Utilities

4.7%
3.1%

Communication Services

3.6%
16.3%

Real Estate

1.0%
3.5%

Financial Services

FEQD.L
24.3%
FLXD.L
35.8%

Industrials

FEQD.L
19.8%
FLXD.L
7.9%

Healthcare

FEQD.L
12.8%
FLXD.L
10.3%

Technology

FEQD.L
9.1%
FLXD.L
0.7%

Consumer Cyclical

FEQD.L
7.9%
FLXD.L
1.0%

Consumer Defensive

FEQD.L
6.7%
FLXD.L
4.6%

Energy

FEQD.L
5.4%
FLXD.L
11.6%

Basic Materials

FEQD.L
4.9%
FLXD.L
5.2%

Utilities

FEQD.L
4.7%
FLXD.L
3.1%

Communication Services

FEQD.L
3.6%
FLXD.L
16.3%

Real Estate

FEQD.L
1.0%
FLXD.L
3.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FEQD.L vs. FLXD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEQD.L
FEQD.L Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
FEQD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEQD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEQD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
FEQD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEQD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

FLXD.L
FLXD.L Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
FLXD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLXD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLXD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
FLXD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLXD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEQD.L vs. FLXD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Europe Quality Income UCITS ETF (FEQD.L) and Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF (FLXD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FEQD.LFLXD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.43

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.01

5.64

-3.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.72

15.75

-9.02

FEQD.L vs. FLXD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEQD.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is lower than the FLXD.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEQD.L and FLXD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FEQD.LFLXD.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.53

2.40

-0.87

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

1.21

-0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.64

-0.13

Drawdowns

FEQD.L vs. FLXD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEQD.L drawdown since its inception was -26.58%, smaller than the maximum FLXD.L drawdown of -29.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEQD.L and FLXD.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FEQD.LFLXD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.58%

-29.71%

+3.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.64%

-3.62%

-6.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.44%

-7.78%

-4.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.06%

-11.76%

-11.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.62%

-2.77%

+1.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.90%

-4.13%

-0.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.89%

1.30%

+1.59%

Volatility

FEQD.L vs. FLXD.L - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Europe Quality Income UCITS ETF (FEQD.L) has a higher volatility of 3.32% compared to Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF (FLXD.L) at 2.67%. This indicates that FEQD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLXD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FEQD.LFLXD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.32%

2.67%

+0.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.39%

6.95%

+3.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.68%

8.52%

+4.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.26%

10.85%

+3.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.99%

12.91%

+2.08%

FEQD.L vs. FLXD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEQD.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than FLXD.L's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

FEQD.L vs. FLXD.L - Dividend Comparison

FEQD.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FLXD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.37%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
FEQD.L
Fidelity Europe Quality Income UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FLXD.L
Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF
4.37%4.90%5.18%5.75%5.87%5.51%3.90%1.53%1.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


FEQD.L and FLXD.L have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FLXD.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FLXD.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for FEQD.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI Europe High Div Yld NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: FIL Investment Management (Luxembourg) S.A., Irela and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for FEQD.L and 0.25% for FLXD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FEQD.L and FLXD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer