FEPI vs. TQQQ

Last updated Jun 28, 2026

FEPI (REX FANG & Innovation Equity Premium Income ETF) and TQQQ (ProShares UltraPro QQQ) are both exchange-traded funds - FEPI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by REX, while TQQQ is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index (300%). FEPI is actively managed, while TQQQ is passively managed. Over the past year, FEPI returned 16.30% vs 77.18% for TQQQ. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FEPI charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for TQQQ.

Performance

FEPI vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in REX FANG & Innovation Equity Premium Income ETF (FEPI) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEPI achieves a 1.96% return, which is significantly lower than TQQQ's 36.47% return.

FEPI

• 1D: -0.50%
• 1M: -9.01%
• YTD: 1.96%
• 6M: 1.18%
• 1Y: 16.30%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TQQQ

• 1D: -4.16%
• 1M: -15.05%
• YTD: 36.47%
• 6M: 30.08%
• 1Y: 77.18%
• 3Y*: 55.74%
• 5Y*: 20.68%
• 10Y*: 44.95%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEPI vs. TQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
FEPI REX FANG & Innovation Equity Premium Income ETF	1.96%	18.33%	15.69%	11.75%
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ	36.47%	34.35%	58.27%	32.20%

Correlation

The correlation between FEPI and TQQQ is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2023	0.92

The correlation between FEPI and TQQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

FEPI vs. TQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FEPI	TQQQ
Technology	65.5%	53.8%
Communication Services	19.6%	15.8%
Consumer Cyclical	12.4%	12.3%
Basic Materials	-	1.1%
Consumer Defensive	-	7.7%
Energy	-	0.6%
Financial Services	-	0.2%
Healthcare	-	4.2%
Industrials	-	2.8%
Real Estate	-	0.1%
Utilities	-	1.4%

Return for Risk

FEPI vs. TQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEPI

FEPI Risk / Return Rank: 26
FEPI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
FEPI Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
FEPI Omega Ratio Rank: 26
FEPI Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
FEPI Martin Ratio Rank: 29

TQQQ

TQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 45
TQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
TQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
TQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 43
TQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
TQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 45

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEPI vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX FANG & Innovation Equity Premium Income ETF (FEPI) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FEPI	TQQQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.91	1.49	-0.57
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.31	1.95	-0.63
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.26	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.26	2.15	-0.89
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.92	6.75	-2.83

FEPI vs. TQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEPI Sharpe Ratio is 0.91, which is lower than the TQQQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEPI and TQQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FEPI vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEPI drawdown since its inception was -23.56%, smaller than the maximum TQQQ drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEPI and TQQQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	FEPI	TQQQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.56%	-81.66%	+58.10%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.91%	-36.97%	+24.06%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-58.04%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-81.66%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-81.66%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.01%	-17.65%	+8.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.55%	-18.49%	+14.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.14%	11.72%	-7.58%

Volatility

FEPI vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for REX FANG & Innovation Equity Premium Income ETF (FEPI) is 7.43%, while ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) has a volatility of 27.08%. This indicates that FEPI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FEPI	TQQQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.43%	27.08%	-19.65%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.93%	43.49%	-29.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.78%	53.41%	-35.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.30%	67.42%	-48.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.30%	66.28%	-46.98%

FEPI vs. TQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEPI has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than TQQQ's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

FEPI vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison

FEPI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 25.49%, more than TQQQ's 0.29% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FEPI REX FANG & Innovation Equity Premium Income ETF	25.49%	25.48%	27.18%	4.21%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ	0.29%	0.65%	1.27%	1.26%	0.57%	0.00%	0.00%	0.06%	0.11%	0.00%	0.00%	0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FEPI and TQQQ in my portfolio?

FEPI and TQQQ have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FEPI or TQQQ?

TQQQ has higher volatility (27.08%) compared to FEPI (7.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEPI dropped -23.56% vs TQQQ's -81.66%.

Which ETF is better, FEPI or TQQQ?

On 1-year performance, TQQQ leads with 77.18% vs 16.30% for FEPI. On fees, FEPI is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, FEPI has been the lower-risk option at 7.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FEPI or TQQQ?

Over the 1-year period, TQQQ has performed better with a 77.18% return vs 16.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FEPI or TQQQ?

FEPI is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TQQQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FEPI or TQQQ?

FEPI has the higher dividend yield at 25.49%, compared with 0.29% for TQQQ.

What is the main difference between FEPI and TQQQ?

FEPI is categorized as Derivative Income, while TQQQ is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: REX and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for FEPI and 0.95% for TQQQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.