FEPG.L vs. AOD
FEPG.L (REX Tech Innovation Premium Income UCITS ETF) is Derivative Income fund actively managed by HANetf, while AOD (Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund) is a stock. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FEPG.L charges 0.65%/yr vs 1.19%/yr for AOD.
Performance
FEPG.L vs. AOD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FEPG.L achieves a -3.44% return, which is significantly lower than AOD's 14.47% return.
FEPG.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -5.73%
- 6M
- 0.07%
- YTD
- -3.44%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
AOD
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- 1.94%
- 6M
- 12.51%
- YTD
- 14.47%
- 1Y
- 32.63%
- 3Y*
- 20.65%
- 5Y*
- 10.91%
- 10Y*
- 13.17%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.19%
FEPG.L vs. AOD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FEPG.L REX Tech Innovation Premium Income UCITS ETF | -3.44% | 8.72% |
AOD Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund | 14.47% | 13.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between FEPG.L and AOD is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2025 | 0.28 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FEPG.L vs. AOD — Risk / Return Rank
FEPG.L
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
AOD
FEPG.L vs. AOD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX Tech Innovation Premium Income UCITS ETF (FEPG.L) and Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund (AOD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FEPG.L | AOD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.38 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.96 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 8.39 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FEPG.L vs. AOD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FEPG.L drawdown since its inception was -35.75%, smaller than the maximum AOD drawdown of -72.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEPG.L and AOD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FEPG.L | AOD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.75% | -72.26% | +36.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -16.71% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.71% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -28.92% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -43.68% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.16% | -0.94% | -27.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.83% | -27.13% | +6.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.90% | — |
Volatility
FEPG.L vs. AOD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FEPG.L | AOD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.85% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 13.67% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.69% | 16.08% | +29.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 45.69% | 16.78% | +28.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 45.69% | 18.51% | +27.18% |
FEPG.L vs. AOD - Expense Ratio Comparison
FEPG.L has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than AOD's 1.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
FEPG.L vs. AOD - Dividend Comparison
FEPG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 27.80%, more than AOD's 11.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AOD Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund | 11.62% | 12.00% | 10.73% | 8.56% | 8.85% | 6.75% | 7.80% | 7.71% | 9.57% | 7.29% | 9.10% | 8.93% |
FEPG.L REX Tech Innovation Premium Income UCITS ETF | 27.80% | 11.50% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FEPG.L and AOD have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for FEPG.L and AOD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer