PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FEP vs. GLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FEP vs. GLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Europe AlphaDEX Fund (FEP) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEP achieves a 11.01% return, which is significantly higher than GLD's 3.95% return. Over the past 10 years, FEP has underperformed GLD with an annualized return of 10.37%, while GLD has yielded a comparatively higher 13.23% annualized return.


FEP

1D
0.44%
1M
2.53%
YTD
11.01%
6M
16.91%
1Y
30.38%
3Y*
25.14%
5Y*
9.81%
10Y*
10.37%

GLD

1D
0.17%
1M
-2.65%
YTD
3.95%
6M
6.38%
1Y
32.18%
3Y*
31.53%
5Y*
18.64%
10Y*
13.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEP vs. GLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FEP
First Trust Europe AlphaDEX Fund
11.01%55.72%3.38%16.85%-22.97%17.03%4.12%24.83%-19.00%36.27%
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
3.95%63.68%26.66%12.69%-0.77%-4.15%24.81%17.86%-1.94%12.81%

Correlation

The correlation between FEP and GLD is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2011

0.16

Over the past year, FEP and GLD have become more correlated (0.37) than their long-term average of 0.16, meaning their price movements have been converging.

FEP vs. GLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FEP
GLD

Industrials

25.4%

-

Basic Materials

11.3%
100.0%

Energy

11.0%

-

Consumer Cyclical

10.7%

-

Financial Services

9.8%

-

Consumer Defensive

8.1%

-

Utilities

7.1%

-

Real Estate

5.2%

-

Healthcare

4.8%

-

Communication Services

3.7%

-

Technology

3.0%

-

Industrials

FEP
25.4%
GLD

-

Basic Materials

FEP
11.3%
GLD
100.0%

Energy

FEP
11.0%
GLD

-

Consumer Cyclical

FEP
10.7%
GLD

-

Financial Services

FEP
9.8%
GLD

-

Consumer Defensive

FEP
8.1%
GLD

-

Utilities

FEP
7.1%
GLD

-

Real Estate

FEP
5.2%
GLD

-

Healthcare

FEP
4.8%
GLD

-

Communication Services

FEP
3.7%
GLD

-

Technology

FEP
3.0%
GLD

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FEP vs. GLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEP
FEP Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
FEP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEP Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
FEP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEP Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

GLD
GLD Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
GLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLD Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
GLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLD Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEP vs. GLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Europe AlphaDEX Fund (FEP) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FEPGLDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.83

1.22

+0.61

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.50

1.61

+0.89

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.24

+0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.68

1.86

+0.82

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.42

4.66

+5.76

FEP vs. GLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEP Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is higher than the GLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEP and GLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FEPGLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.83

1.22

+0.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

1.04

-0.54

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

0.83

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.60

-0.26

Drawdowns

FEP vs. GLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEP drawdown since its inception was -46.05%, roughly equal to the maximum GLD drawdown of -45.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEP and GLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FEPGLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.05%

-45.56%

-0.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.13%

-19.21%

+7.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.83%

-19.21%

+3.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.99%

-21.03%

-17.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.05%

-22.00%

-24.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.55%

-16.93%

+16.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.03%

-16.16%

+4.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.11%

7.65%

-4.54%

Volatility

FEP vs. GLD - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Europe AlphaDEX Fund (FEP) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) have volatilities of 5.90% and 5.78%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FEPGLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.90%

5.78%

+0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.92%

23.14%

-9.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.77%

26.71%

-9.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.67%

18.02%

+1.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.73%

15.95%

+4.78%

FEP vs. GLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEP has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than GLD's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

FEP vs. GLD - Dividend Comparison

FEP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.95%, while GLD has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FEP
First Trust Europe AlphaDEX Fund
2.95%3.33%4.94%3.27%3.00%3.49%2.32%2.63%2.62%1.65%2.14%2.20%
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FEP and GLD have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FEP has higher volatility (5.90%) compared to GLD (5.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEP dropped -46.05% vs GLD's -45.56%.

On 10-year performance, GLD leads with 13.23% vs 10.37% for FEP. On fees, GLD is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, GLD has been the lower-risk option at 5.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, GLD has performed better with a 13.23% return vs 10.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GLD is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FEP.

FEP has the higher dividend yield at 2.95%, compared with 0.00% for GLD.

FEP is categorized as Europe Equities, while GLD is Gold. FEP tracks Defined Europe Index, while GLD tracks LBMA Gold Price PM. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for FEP and 0.40% for GLD.

FEP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FEP and GLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer