PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FEP vs. FSZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FEP vs. FSZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Europe AlphaDEX Fund (FEP) and First Trust Switzerland AlphaDEX Fund (FSZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEP achieves a 11.59% return, which is significantly higher than FSZ's 3.71% return. Over the past 10 years, FEP has outperformed FSZ with an annualized return of 10.76%, while FSZ has yielded a comparatively lower 9.81% annualized return.


FEP

1D
-0.14%
1M
2.41%
6M
5.11%
YTD
11.59%
1Y
28.08%
3Y*
22.63%
5Y*
10.19%
10Y*
10.76%
ALL TIME*
7.19%

FSZ

1D
-0.86%
1M
-1.77%
6M
0.25%
YTD
3.71%
1Y
10.06%
3Y*
11.44%
5Y*
5.67%
10Y*
9.81%
ALL TIME*
9.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$974.88K$1.10M$1.43M
$60.99K$62.05K$87.92K

FEP vs. FSZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FEP
First Trust Europe AlphaDEX Fund
11.59%55.72%3.38%16.85%-22.97%17.03%4.12%24.83%-19.00%36.27%
FSZ
First Trust Switzerland AlphaDEX Fund
3.71%30.10%-1.85%21.30%-20.12%20.18%13.83%25.88%-15.22%31.30%

Correlation

The correlation between FEP and FSZ is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.73

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2012

0.73

The correlation between FEP and FSZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

FEP vs. FSZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FEP
FSZ

Industrials

26.5%
22.2%

Consumer Cyclical

10.5%
11.0%

Basic Materials

10.5%
8.0%

Financial Services

10.4%
18.8%

Energy

9.8%

-

Consumer Defensive

8.3%
6.3%

Utilities

7.0%
2.6%

Healthcare

5.1%
23.1%

Real Estate

5.1%
3.2%

Communication Services

3.6%
3.5%

Technology

3.2%
1.4%

Industrials

FEP
26.5%
FSZ
22.2%

Consumer Cyclical

FEP
10.5%
FSZ
11.0%

Basic Materials

FEP
10.5%
FSZ
8.0%

Financial Services

FEP
10.4%
FSZ
18.8%

Energy

FEP
9.8%
FSZ

-

Consumer Defensive

FEP
8.3%
FSZ
6.3%

Utilities

FEP
7.0%
FSZ
2.6%

Healthcare

FEP
5.1%
FSZ
23.1%

Real Estate

FEP
5.1%
FSZ
3.2%

Communication Services

FEP
3.6%
FSZ
3.5%

Technology

FEP
3.2%
FSZ
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FEP vs. FSZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FEP
FEP Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
FEP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEP Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
FEP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEP Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

FSZ
FSZ Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
FSZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSZ Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
FSZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSZ Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FEP vs. FSZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Europe AlphaDEX Fund (FEP) and First Trust Switzerland AlphaDEX Fund (FSZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FEPFSZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.10

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.28

0.78

+1.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.53

2.09

+6.44

FEP vs. FSZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEP Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is higher than the FSZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEP and FSZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FEP vs. FSZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEP drawdown since its inception was -46.05%, which is greater than FSZ's maximum drawdown of -33.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEP and FSZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FEPFSZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.05%

-33.97%

-12.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.13%

-10.39%

-1.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.83%

-13.93%

-1.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.99%

-33.96%

-5.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.05%

-33.97%

-12.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.14%

-3.56%

+3.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.92%

-6.96%

-4.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.24%

3.89%

-0.65%

Volatility

FEP vs. FSZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Europe AlphaDEX Fund (FEP) is 3.97%, while First Trust Switzerland AlphaDEX Fund (FSZ) has a volatility of 5.15%. This indicates that FEP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FEPFSZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.97%

5.15%

-1.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.75%

11.59%

+3.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.97%

14.58%

+2.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.67%

19.42%

+0.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.19%

18.71%

+1.48%

FEP vs. FSZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FEP and FSZ have an expense ratio of 0.80%.


Dividends

FEP vs. FSZ - Dividend Comparison

FEP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.71%, more than FSZ's 2.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FEP
First Trust Europe AlphaDEX Fund
2.71%3.33%4.94%3.27%3.00%3.49%2.32%2.63%2.62%1.65%2.14%2.20%
FSZ
First Trust Switzerland AlphaDEX Fund
2.00%1.80%1.80%2.11%3.50%1.62%1.53%2.01%2.29%1.49%1.93%1.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


FEP and FSZ have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSZ has higher volatility (5.15%) compared to FEP (3.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEP dropped -46.05% vs FSZ's -33.97%.

On 10-year performance, FEP leads with 10.76% vs 9.81% for FSZ. Both ETFs have the same 0.80% expense ratio. On volatility, FEP has been the lower-risk option at 3.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FEP has performed better with a 10.76% return vs 9.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FEP and FSZ have the same expense ratio: 0.80% per year.

FEP has the higher dividend yield at 2.71%, compared with 2.00% for FSZ.

FEP tracks Defined Europe Index, while FSZ tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Switzerland Index.

FEP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FEP and FSZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer