PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FEP vs. EPOL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FEP vs. EPOL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Europe AlphaDEX Fund (FEP) and iShares MSCI Poland ETF (EPOL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEP achieves a 11.59% return, which is significantly lower than EPOL's 22.62% return. Over the past 10 years, FEP has underperformed EPOL with an annualized return of 10.76%, while EPOL has yielded a comparatively higher 11.96% annualized return.


FEP

1D
-0.14%
1M
2.41%
6M
5.11%
YTD
11.59%
1Y
28.08%
3Y*
22.63%
5Y*
10.19%
10Y*
10.76%
ALL TIME*
7.19%

EPOL

1D
0.16%
1M
8.60%
6M
14.79%
YTD
22.62%
1Y
40.70%
3Y*
33.53%
5Y*
18.62%
10Y*
11.96%
ALL TIME*
6.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$18.30M$16.66M$16.43M
$974.88K$1.10M$1.43M

FEP vs. EPOL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FEP
First Trust Europe AlphaDEX Fund
11.59%55.72%3.38%16.85%-22.97%17.03%4.12%24.83%-19.00%36.27%
EPOL
iShares MSCI Poland ETF
22.62%77.34%-2.61%50.70%-24.62%12.21%-8.38%-6.13%-13.76%52.43%

Correlation

The correlation between FEP and EPOL is 0.72, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.70

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 26, 2011

0.64

The correlation between FEP and EPOL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

FEP vs. EPOL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FEP
EPOL

Industrials

26.5%
1.8%

Consumer Cyclical

10.5%
14.0%

Basic Materials

10.5%
7.1%

Financial Services

10.4%
45.7%

Energy

9.8%
13.2%

Consumer Defensive

8.3%
6.0%

Utilities

7.0%
4.5%

Healthcare

5.1%
0.7%

Real Estate

5.1%

-

Communication Services

3.6%
5.4%

Technology

3.2%
1.7%

Industrials

FEP
26.5%
EPOL
1.8%

Consumer Cyclical

FEP
10.5%
EPOL
14.0%

Basic Materials

FEP
10.5%
EPOL
7.1%

Financial Services

FEP
10.4%
EPOL
45.7%

Energy

FEP
9.8%
EPOL
13.2%

Consumer Defensive

FEP
8.3%
EPOL
6.0%

Utilities

FEP
7.0%
EPOL
4.5%

Healthcare

FEP
5.1%
EPOL
0.7%

Real Estate

FEP
5.1%
EPOL

-

Communication Services

FEP
3.6%
EPOL
5.4%

Technology

FEP
3.2%
EPOL
1.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FEP vs. EPOL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FEP
FEP Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
FEP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEP Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
FEP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEP Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

EPOL
EPOL Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
EPOL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EPOL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
EPOL Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
EPOL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
EPOL Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FEP vs. EPOL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Europe AlphaDEX Fund (FEP) and iShares MSCI Poland ETF (EPOL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FEPEPOLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.29

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.28

3.68

-1.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.53

9.96

-1.43

FEP vs. EPOL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEP Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is comparable to the EPOL Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEP and EPOL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FEP vs. EPOL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEP drawdown since its inception was -46.05%, smaller than the maximum EPOL drawdown of -63.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEP and EPOL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FEPEPOLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.05%

-63.72%

+17.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.13%

-11.04%

-1.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.83%

-19.56%

+3.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.99%

-54.21%

+15.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.05%

-61.41%

+15.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.14%

0.00%

-0.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.92%

-26.64%

+14.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.24%

4.07%

-0.83%

Volatility

FEP vs. EPOL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Europe AlphaDEX Fund (FEP) is 3.97%, while iShares MSCI Poland ETF (EPOL) has a volatility of 5.29%. This indicates that FEP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EPOL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FEPEPOLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.97%

5.29%

-1.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.75%

18.34%

-3.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.97%

23.12%

-6.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.67%

29.12%

-9.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.19%

27.42%

-7.23%

FEP vs. EPOL - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEP has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than EPOL's 0.61% expense ratio.


Dividends

FEP vs. EPOL - Dividend Comparison

FEP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.71%, less than EPOL's 3.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EPOL
iShares MSCI Poland ETF
3.44%4.78%6.04%2.87%2.65%1.33%1.44%2.51%1.44%1.88%2.14%2.53%
FEP
First Trust Europe AlphaDEX Fund
2.71%3.33%4.94%3.27%3.00%3.49%2.32%2.63%2.62%1.65%2.14%2.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


FEP and EPOL have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EPOL has higher volatility (5.29%) compared to FEP (3.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEP dropped -46.05% vs EPOL's -63.72%.

On 10-year performance, EPOL leads with 11.96% vs 10.76% for FEP. On fees, EPOL is cheaper at 0.61% per year. On volatility, FEP has been the lower-risk option at 3.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EPOL has performed better with a 11.96% return vs 10.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EPOL is cheaper with a 0.61% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FEP.

EPOL has the higher dividend yield at 3.44%, compared with 2.71% for FEP.

FEP tracks Defined Europe Index, while EPOL tracks MSCI Poland Investable Market Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for FEP and 0.61% for EPOL.

EPOL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FEP and EPOL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer