FENY vs. XLK

Last updated Jul 21, 2026

FENY (Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF) and XLK (State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FENY is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Energy 25/50 Index, while XLK is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FENY returned 9.16%/yr vs 23.89%/yr for XLK. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FENY charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLK.

Performance

FENY vs. XLK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF (FENY) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FENY achieves a 31.48% return, which is significantly higher than XLK's 22.34% return. Over the past 10 years, FENY has underperformed XLK with an annualized return of 9.16%, while XLK has yielded a comparatively higher 23.89% annualized return.

FENY

• 1D: 0.44%
• 1M: 8.43%
• 6M: 23.04%
• YTD: 31.48%
• 1Y: 39.04%
• 3Y*: 15.11%
• 5Y*: 22.96%
• 10Y*: 9.16%
• ALL TIME*: 5.42%

XLK

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: -8.11%
• 6M: 20.96%
• YTD: 22.34%
• 1Y: 35.41%
• 3Y*: 26.73%
• 5Y*: 19.16%
• 10Y*: 23.89%
• ALL TIME*: 10.23%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FENY vs. XLK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FENY Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF	31.48%	7.27%	6.62%	-0.04%	62.94%	55.62%	-33.15%	9.11%	-19.99%	-2.30%
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF	22.34%	24.61%	21.63%	56.02%	-27.73%	34.74%	43.62%	49.86%	-1.68%	34.26%

Correlation

The correlation between FENY and XLK is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.11
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.06
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.18
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.27
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2013	0.32

The correlation between FENY and XLK shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.32 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FENY vs. XLK - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FENY	XLK
Energy	99.6%	0.2%
Basic Materials	0.3%	-
Industrials	0.1%	0.1%
Utilities	0.1%	-
Communication Services	-	0.9%
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	99.1%

Return for Risk

FENY vs. XLK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FENY

FENY Risk / Return Rank: 69
FENY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
FENY Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
FENY Omega Ratio Rank: 70
FENY Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
FENY Martin Ratio Rank: 56

XLK

XLK Risk / Return Rank: 54
XLK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
XLK Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
XLK Omega Ratio Rank: 52
XLK Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
XLK Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FENY vs. XLK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF (FENY) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FENY	XLK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.88	1.45	+0.44
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.46	1.93	+0.53
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.25	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.62	2.23	+0.39
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.08	6.53	+0.55

FENY vs. XLK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FENY Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is higher than the XLK Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FENY and XLK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FENY vs. XLK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FENY drawdown since its inception was -74.35%, smaller than the maximum XLK drawdown of -82.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FENY and XLK.

Drawdown Indicators

	FENY	XLK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-74.35%	-82.05%	+7.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.96%	-15.92%	+0.96%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.47%	-25.66%	+4.19%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.64%	-33.56%	+6.92%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-69.07%	-33.56%	-35.51%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.92%	-11.25%	+4.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.00%	-34.83%	+11.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.53%	5.43%	+0.10%

Volatility

FENY vs. XLK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF (FENY) is 5.94%, while State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) has a volatility of 9.59%. This indicates that FENY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FENY	XLK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.94%	9.59%	-3.65%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.41%	20.94%	-4.53%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.86%	24.61%	-3.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.25%	25.57%	+0.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.79%	24.81%	+4.98%

FENY vs. XLK - Expense Ratio Comparison

FENY has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than XLK's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FENY vs. XLK - Dividend Comparison

FENY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.42%, more than XLK's 0.45% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FENY Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF	2.42%	3.18%	3.05%	3.33%	3.33%	3.69%	4.60%	6.43%	3.21%	2.94%	2.29%	3.05%
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF	0.45%	0.54%	0.66%	0.76%	1.04%	0.65%	0.92%	1.16%	1.60%	1.37%	1.74%	1.79%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FENY and XLK in my portfolio?

FENY and XLK have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FENY or XLK?

XLK has higher volatility (9.59%) compared to FENY (5.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FENY dropped -74.35% vs XLK's -82.05%.

Which ETF is better, FENY or XLK?

On 10-year performance, XLK leads with 23.89% vs 9.16% for FENY. On fees, XLK is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, FENY has been the lower-risk option at 5.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FENY or XLK?

Over the 10-year period, XLK has performed better with a 23.89% return vs 9.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FENY or XLK?

XLK is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for FENY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FENY or XLK?

FENY has the higher dividend yield at 2.42%, compared with 0.45% for XLK.

What is the main difference between FENY and XLK?

FENY is categorized as Energy Equities, while XLK is Technology Equities. FENY tracks MSCI USA IMI Energy 25/50 Index, while XLK tracks S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for FENY and 0.08% for XLK.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FENY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.