PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FENY vs. BACAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FENY vs. BACAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF (FENY) and BlackRock Energy Opportunities Fund (BACAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FENY achieves a 32.28% return, which is significantly higher than BACAX's 28.98% return. Over the past 10 years, FENY has outperformed BACAX with an annualized return of 9.57%, while BACAX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.62% annualized return.


FENY

1D
1.12%
1M
-2.02%
YTD
32.28%
6M
29.37%
1Y
45.42%
3Y*
17.98%
5Y*
20.48%
10Y*
9.57%

BACAX

1D
1.35%
1M
-2.76%
YTD
28.98%
6M
27.65%
1Y
41.36%
3Y*
17.11%
5Y*
18.44%
10Y*
8.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FENY vs. BACAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FENY
Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF
32.28%7.27%6.62%-0.04%62.94%55.62%-33.15%9.11%-19.99%-2.30%
BACAX
BlackRock Energy Opportunities Fund
28.98%10.53%3.78%2.61%43.02%42.93%-29.68%12.64%-19.98%2.07%

Correlation

The correlation between FENY and BACAX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2013

0.97

The correlation between FENY and BACAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FENY vs. BACAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FENY
FENY Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
FENY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FENY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
FENY Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
FENY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
FENY Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

BACAX
BACAX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
BACAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BACAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
BACAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
BACAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
BACAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FENY vs. BACAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF (FENY) and BlackRock Energy Opportunities Fund (BACAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FENYBACAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.41

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.87

4.69

-0.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.41

13.98

-2.57

FENY vs. BACAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FENY Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is comparable to the BACAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FENY and BACAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FENYBACAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.24

2.49

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

0.79

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

0.32

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.20

0.18

+0.02

Drawdowns

FENY vs. BACAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FENY drawdown since its inception was -74.35%, smaller than the maximum BACAX drawdown of -78.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FENY and BACAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FENYBACAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.35%

-78.88%

+4.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.78%

-9.11%

-2.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.47%

-18.73%

-2.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.64%

-25.74%

-0.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-69.07%

-65.92%

-3.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.35%

-5.81%

-0.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.12%

-34.28%

+11.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.99%

3.05%

+0.94%

Volatility

FENY vs. BACAX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF (FENY) has a higher volatility of 7.96% compared to BlackRock Energy Opportunities Fund (BACAX) at 6.98%. This indicates that FENY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BACAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FENYBACAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.96%

6.98%

+0.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.33%

14.12%

+2.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.39%

17.23%

+3.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.46%

23.55%

+2.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.80%

27.22%

+2.58%

FENY vs. BACAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FENY has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than BACAX's 1.32% expense ratio.


Dividends

FENY vs. BACAX - Dividend Comparison

FENY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.41%, more than BACAX's 1.92% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BACAX
BlackRock Energy Opportunities Fund
1.92%2.47%2.29%3.06%2.21%2.39%3.38%2.69%2.87%2.48%1.95%1.98%
FENY
Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF
2.41%3.18%3.05%3.33%3.33%3.69%4.60%6.43%3.21%2.94%2.29%3.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, FENY and BACAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FENY has higher volatility (7.96%) compared to BACAX (6.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FENY dropped -74.35% vs BACAX's -78.88%.

BACAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FENY and BACAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer