FEMV vs. SDY
FEMV (Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Value ETF) and SDY (SPDR S&P Dividend ETF) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds. FEMV is actively managed, while SDY is passively managed. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FEMV charges 0.23%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SDY.
Performance
FEMV vs. SDY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FEMV
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 4.12%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SDY
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- 4.47%
- 6M
- 10.78%
- YTD
- 13.24%
- 1Y
- 15.95%
- 3Y*
- 11.81%
- 5Y*
- 7.90%
- 10Y*
- 9.48%
FEMV vs. SDY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
FEMV Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Value ETF | 6.72% |
SDY SPDR S&P Dividend ETF | 6.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between FEMV and SDY is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2026 | 0.43 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FEMV vs. SDY — Risk / Return Rank
FEMV
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SDY
FEMV vs. SDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Value ETF (FEMV) and SPDR S&P Dividend ETF (SDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FEMV | SDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.27 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.09 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 5.61 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FEMV vs. SDY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FEMV drawdown since its inception was -2.69%, smaller than the maximum SDY drawdown of -54.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEMV and SDY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FEMV | SDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.69% | -54.75% | +52.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.67% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.39% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -15.21% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.70% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.03% | +0.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.55% | -6.19% | +5.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.85% | — |
Volatility
FEMV vs. SDY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FEMV | SDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.39% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.76% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.25% | 10.42% | +1.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.25% | 14.01% | -1.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.25% | 17.05% | -4.80% |
FEMV vs. SDY - Expense Ratio Comparison
FEMV has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than SDY's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
FEMV vs. SDY - Dividend Comparison
FEMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%, less than SDY's 2.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEMV Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Value ETF | 0.26% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SDY SPDR S&P Dividend ETF | 2.40% | 2.61% | 2.56% | 2.64% | 2.55% | 2.63% | 2.85% | 2.45% | 2.73% | 4.69% | 3.30% | 6.20% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FEMV and SDY have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FEMV is cheaper at 0.23% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FEMV is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for SDY.
SDY has the higher dividend yield at 2.40%, compared with 0.26% for FEMV.
They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for FEMV and 0.35% for SDY.
Find the right allocation for FEMV and SDY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer