FEMSX vs. FSKAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund (FEMSX) and Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX).
FEMSX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Dec 9, 2008. FSKAX is managed by Fidelity.
Performance
FEMSX vs. FSKAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FEMSX vs. FSKAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEMSX Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund | 1.83% | 37.92% | 7.84% | 14.23% | -23.95% | -5.14% | 24.72% | 28.87% | -16.20% | 49.92% |
FSKAX Fidelity Total Market Index Fund | -6.77% | 17.06% | 23.89% | 26.12% | -19.53% | 25.66% | 20.79% | 30.92% | -5.32% | 20.85% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FEMSX achieves a 1.83% return, which is significantly higher than FSKAX's -6.77% return. Over the past 10 years, FEMSX has underperformed FSKAX with an annualized return of 10.49%, while FSKAX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.23% annualized return.
FEMSX
- 1D
- -0.87%
- 1M
- -12.51%
- YTD
- 1.83%
- 6M
- 7.74%
- 1Y
- 34.77%
- 3Y*
- 17.94%
- 5Y*
- 3.95%
- 10Y*
- 10.49%
FSKAX
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- -7.69%
- YTD
- -6.77%
- 6M
- -4.56%
- 1Y
- 14.73%
- 3Y*
- 16.72%
- 5Y*
- 10.13%
- 10Y*
- 13.23%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FEMSX vs. FSKAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FEMSX has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than FSKAX's 0.02% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
FEMSX vs. FSKAX — Risk / Return Rank
FEMSX
FSKAX
FEMSX vs. FSKAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund (FEMSX) and Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FEMSX | FSKAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.82 | 0.83 | +0.99 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.37 | 1.29 | +1.08 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.19 | +0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.35 | 1.04 | +1.31 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.45 | 5.05 | +4.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FEMSX | FSKAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.82 | 0.83 | +0.99 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 | 0.59 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | 0.72 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.78 | -0.29 |
Correlation
The correlation between FEMSX and FSKAX is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
FEMSX vs. FSKAX - Dividend Comparison
FEMSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.40%, more than FSKAX's 1.09% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEMSX Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund | 2.40% | 2.45% | 2.08% | 2.82% | 2.39% | 12.83% | 2.99% | 2.48% | 9.42% | 8.98% | 1.46% | 1.27% |
FSKAX Fidelity Total Market Index Fund | 1.09% | 1.01% | 1.19% | 1.41% | 1.62% | 1.15% | 1.45% | 1.94% | 2.54% | 2.07% | 2.43% | 0.82% |
Drawdowns
FEMSX vs. FSKAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FEMSX drawdown since its inception was -44.16%, which is greater than FSKAX's maximum drawdown of -35.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEMSX and FSKAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FEMSX | FSKAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.16% | -35.01% | -9.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.42% | -12.42% | -1.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.64% | -25.39% | -16.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.16% | -35.01% | -9.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.42% | -8.92% | -4.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.52% | -4.05% | -9.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.34% | 2.57% | +0.77% |
Volatility
FEMSX vs. FSKAX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund (FEMSX) has a higher volatility of 9.59% compared to Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX) at 4.42%. This indicates that FEMSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSKAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FEMSX | FSKAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.59% | 4.42% | +5.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.36% | 9.40% | +4.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.89% | 18.50% | +0.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.58% | 17.38% | +1.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.10% | 18.42% | +0.68% |