FEMR vs. FBTC

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

FEMR (Fidelity Enhanced Emerging Markets ETF) and FBTC (Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - FEMR is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund actively managed by Fidelity, while FBTC is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Fidelity Bitcoin Reference Rate. FEMR is actively managed, while FBTC is passively managed. Over the past year, FEMR returned 39.91% vs -46.29% for FBTC. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FEMR charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FBTC.

Performance

FEMR vs. FBTC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Enhanced Emerging Markets ETF (FEMR) and Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEMR achieves a 22.10% return, which is significantly higher than FBTC's -26.63% return.

FEMR

• 1D: -2.32%
• 1M: -6.65%
• 6M: 14.28%
• YTD: 22.10%
• 1Y: 39.91%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FBTC

• 1D: -1.08%
• 1M: -2.10%
• 6M: -32.61%
• YTD: -26.63%
• 1Y: -46.29%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEMR vs. FBTC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FEMR Fidelity Enhanced Emerging Markets ETF	22.10%	35.27%	-1.48%
FBTC Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund	-26.63%	-6.56%	-1.16%

Correlation

The correlation between FEMR and FBTC is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.45
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2024	0.41

Return for Risk

FEMR vs. FBTC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEMR

FEMR Risk / Return Rank: 63
FEMR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
FEMR Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
FEMR Omega Ratio Rank: 65
FEMR Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
FEMR Martin Ratio Rank: 67

FBTC

FBTC Risk / Return Rank: 2
FBTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
FBTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
FBTC Omega Ratio Rank: 2
FBTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
FBTC Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEMR vs. FBTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Enhanced Emerging Markets ETF (FEMR) and Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FEMR	FBTC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.63	-1.05	+2.68
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.14	-1.59	+3.73
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	0.82	+0.48
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.77	-0.87	+3.64
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.46	-1.40	+10.86

FEMR vs. FBTC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEMR Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is higher than the FBTC Sharpe Ratio of -1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEMR and FBTC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FEMR vs. FBTC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEMR drawdown since its inception was -15.58%, smaller than the maximum FBTC drawdown of -53.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEMR and FBTC.

Drawdown Indicators

	FEMR	FBTC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.58%	-53.35%	+37.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.47%	-53.35%	+38.88%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.08%	-48.89%	+37.81%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.57%	-17.64%	+15.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.23%	33.11%	-28.88%

Volatility

FEMR vs. FBTC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Enhanced Emerging Markets ETF (FEMR) is 10.03%, while Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC) has a volatility of 10.78%. This indicates that FEMR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBTC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FEMR	FBTC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.03%	10.78%	-0.75%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.62%	34.75%	-12.13%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.65%	44.27%	-19.62%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.03%	49.78%	-26.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.03%	49.78%	-26.75%

FEMR vs. FBTC - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEMR has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than FBTC's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

FEMR vs. FBTC - Dividend Comparison

FEMR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.56%, while FBTC has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
FBTC Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FEMR Fidelity Enhanced Emerging Markets ETF	1.56%	1.92%	0.37%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FEMR and FBTC in my portfolio?

FEMR and FBTC have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FEMR or FBTC?

FBTC has higher volatility (10.78%) compared to FEMR (10.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEMR dropped -15.58% vs FBTC's -53.35%.

Which ETF is better, FEMR or FBTC?

On 1-year performance, FEMR leads with 39.91% vs -46.29% for FBTC. On fees, FBTC is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, FEMR has been the lower-risk option at 10.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FEMR or FBTC?

Over the 1-year period, FEMR has performed better with a 39.91% return vs -46.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FEMR or FBTC?

FBTC is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for FEMR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FEMR or FBTC?

FEMR has the higher dividend yield at 1.56%, compared with 0.00% for FBTC.

What is the main difference between FEMR and FBTC?

FEMR is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while FBTC is Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for FEMR and 0.25% for FBTC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FEMR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs -1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.