PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FEMR vs. FBND
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FEMR vs. FBND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Enhanced Emerging Markets ETF (FEMR) and Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FEMR vs. FBND - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
FEMR
Fidelity Enhanced Emerging Markets ETF
5.18%35.27%-1.49%
FBND
Fidelity Total Bond ETF
0.14%7.57%-0.28%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEMR achieves a 5.18% return, which is significantly higher than FBND's 0.14% return.


FEMR

1D
4.08%
1M
-10.27%
YTD
5.18%
6M
10.69%
1Y
36.33%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FBND

1D
0.31%
1M
-1.78%
YTD
0.14%
6M
1.01%
1Y
4.73%
3Y*
4.42%
5Y*
1.01%
10Y*
2.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FEMR vs. FBND - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEMR has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than FBND's 0.36% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FEMR vs. FBND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEMR
FEMR Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
FEMR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEMR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEMR Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
FEMR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEMR Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

FBND
FBND Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
FBND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBND Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBND Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
FBND Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBND Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEMR vs. FBND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Enhanced Emerging Markets ETF (FEMR) and Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FEMRFBNDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.74

1.07

+0.67

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.30

1.50

+0.80

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.19

+0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.48

1.82

+0.66

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.93

5.71

+4.21

FEMR vs. FBND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEMR Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is higher than the FBND Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEMR and FBND, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FEMRFBNDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.74

1.07

+0.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.45

0.44

+1.00

Correlation

The correlation between FEMR and FBND is 0.11, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

FEMR vs. FBND - Dividend Comparison

FEMR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.78%, less than FBND's 4.73% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FEMR
Fidelity Enhanced Emerging Markets ETF
1.78%1.92%0.37%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FBND
Fidelity Total Bond ETF
4.73%4.70%4.73%4.26%3.07%1.86%4.25%2.90%2.93%2.56%2.84%3.26%

Drawdowns

FEMR vs. FBND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEMR drawdown since its inception was -15.58%, smaller than the maximum FBND drawdown of -17.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEMR and FBND.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FEMRFBNDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.58%

-17.25%

+1.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.47%

-2.79%

-11.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.98%

-1.78%

-9.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.32%

-3.38%

+1.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.62%

0.89%

+2.73%

Volatility

FEMR vs. FBND - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Enhanced Emerging Markets ETF (FEMR) has a higher volatility of 11.53% compared to Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND) at 1.66%. This indicates that FEMR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FEMRFBNDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.53%

1.66%

+9.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.72%

2.62%

+13.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.01%

4.45%

+16.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.88%

5.90%

+13.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.88%

6.09%

+13.79%