PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FEMKX vs. FSCRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FEMKX vs. FSCRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Emerging Markets (FEMKX) and Fidelity Small Cap Discovery Fund (FSCRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEMKX achieves a 27.91% return, which is significantly higher than FSCRX's 17.56% return. Over the past 10 years, FEMKX has outperformed FSCRX with an annualized return of 12.36%, while FSCRX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.09% annualized return.


FEMKX

1D
3.64%
1M
7.14%
YTD
27.91%
6M
29.94%
1Y
55.13%
3Y*
21.96%
5Y*
7.60%
10Y*
12.36%

FSCRX

1D
2.14%
1M
5.18%
YTD
17.56%
6M
15.04%
1Y
34.63%
3Y*
14.48%
5Y*
8.58%
10Y*
10.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEMKX vs. FSCRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FEMKX
Fidelity Emerging Markets
27.91%31.02%7.12%15.16%-27.48%1.25%32.56%33.67%-18.03%46.92%
FSCRX
Fidelity Small Cap Discovery Fund
17.56%10.89%2.75%21.28%-16.68%35.66%6.87%27.31%-14.06%7.71%

Correlation

The correlation between FEMKX and FSCRX is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2000

0.59

The correlation between FEMKX and FSCRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FEMKX vs. FSCRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEMKX
FEMKX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
FEMKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEMKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEMKX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
FEMKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEMKX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

FSCRX
FSCRX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
FSCRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSCRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSCRX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
FSCRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSCRX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEMKX vs. FSCRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Emerging Markets (FEMKX) and Fidelity Small Cap Discovery Fund (FSCRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FEMKXFSCRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.32

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.19

3.04

+1.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.95

10.03

+4.92

FEMKX vs. FSCRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEMKX Sharpe Ratio is 2.52, which is higher than the FSCRX Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEMKX and FSCRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FEMKX vs. FSCRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEMKX drawdown since its inception was -71.14%, which is greater than FSCRX's maximum drawdown of -56.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEMKX and FSCRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FEMKXFSCRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.14%

-56.27%

-14.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.00%

-11.34%

-1.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.13%

-22.51%

+3.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.88%

-25.91%

-14.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.24%

-47.06%

+3.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.23%

0.00%

-0.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.92%

-7.91%

-18.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.64%

3.43%

+0.21%

Volatility

FEMKX vs. FSCRX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Emerging Markets (FEMKX) has a higher volatility of 11.90% compared to Fidelity Small Cap Discovery Fund (FSCRX) at 7.11%. This indicates that FEMKX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSCRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FEMKXFSCRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.90%

7.11%

+4.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.29%

14.15%

+5.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.60%

18.65%

+2.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.48%

20.32%

-0.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.96%

21.78%

-2.82%

FEMKX vs. FSCRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEMKX has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is lower than FSCRX's 0.98% expense ratio.


Dividends

FEMKX vs. FSCRX - Dividend Comparison

FEMKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, less than FSCRX's 12.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FEMKX
Fidelity Emerging Markets
0.04%0.05%0.65%1.11%0.77%6.00%1.39%1.71%0.83%0.08%0.67%0.51%
FSCRX
Fidelity Small Cap Discovery Fund
12.87%14.70%13.03%4.44%11.56%6.12%2.79%7.46%35.48%13.68%0.44%7.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


FEMKX and FSCRX have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FEMKX has higher volatility (11.90%) compared to FSCRX (7.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEMKX dropped -71.14% vs FSCRX's -56.27%.

FEMKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FEMKX and FSCRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer