PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FEMKX vs. FQEMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FEMKX vs. FQEMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Emerging Markets Fund (FEMKX) and Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series EM (FQEMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEMKX achieves a 13.92% return, which is significantly lower than FQEMX's 50.59% return.


FEMKX

1D
3.84%
1M
-4.46%
6M
6.75%
YTD
13.92%
1Y
33.30%
3Y*
16.57%
5Y*
6.05%
10Y*
10.42%
ALL TIME*
6.18%

FQEMX

1D
7.06%
1M
-8.87%
6M
28.08%
YTD
50.59%
1Y
93.48%
3Y*
36.13%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
18.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FEMKX vs. FQEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FEMKX
Fidelity Emerging Markets Fund
13.92%31.02%7.12%15.16%-27.48%-4.91%
FQEMX
Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series EM
50.59%55.98%6.67%12.18%-20.68%0.32%

Correlation

The correlation between FEMKX and FQEMX is 0.87, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2021

0.85

The correlation between FEMKX and FQEMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FEMKX vs. FQEMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FEMKX
FEMKX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
FEMKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEMKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEMKX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
FEMKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEMKX Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

FQEMX
FQEMX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
FQEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FQEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
FQEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
FQEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
FQEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FEMKX vs. FQEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Emerging Markets Fund (FEMKX) and Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series EM (FQEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FEMKXFQEMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.42

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.06

3.32

-1.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.75

12.24

-5.49

FEMKX vs. FQEMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEMKX Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is lower than the FQEMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEMKX and FQEMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FEMKX vs. FQEMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEMKX drawdown since its inception was -71.14%, which is greater than FQEMX's maximum drawdown of -34.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEMKX and FQEMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FEMKXFQEMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.14%

-34.46%

-36.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.94%

-26.96%

+12.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.13%

-26.96%

+7.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.68%

-21.81%

+10.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.86%

-10.81%

-15.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.56%

7.26%

-2.70%

Volatility

FEMKX vs. FQEMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Emerging Markets Fund (FEMKX) is 9.59%, while Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series EM (FQEMX) has a volatility of 17.42%. This indicates that FEMKX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FQEMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FEMKXFQEMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.59%

17.42%

-7.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.93%

35.65%

-13.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.08%

37.87%

-13.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.96%

23.92%

-3.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.18%

23.92%

-4.74%

FEMKX vs. FQEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEMKX has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than FQEMX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

FEMKX vs. FQEMX - Dividend Comparison

FEMKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, less than FQEMX's 2.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FEMKX
Fidelity Emerging Markets Fund
0.04%0.05%0.65%1.11%0.77%6.00%1.39%1.71%0.83%0.08%0.67%0.51%
FQEMX
Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series EM
2.11%3.18%3.15%4.82%3.93%0.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FEMKX and FQEMX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FQEMX has higher volatility (17.42%) compared to FEMKX (9.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEMKX dropped -71.14% vs FQEMX's -34.46%.

FQEMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FEMKX and FQEMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer