FEMKX vs. FGOMX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Emerging Markets (FEMKX) and Strategic Advisers Fidelity Emerging Markets Fund (FGOMX).
FEMKX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 1, 1990. FGOMX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Oct 29, 2018.
Performance
FEMKX vs. FGOMX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FEMKX vs. FGOMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEMKX Fidelity Emerging Markets | 0.94% | 31.02% | 7.12% | 15.16% | -27.48% | 1.25% | 32.56% | 33.67% | -3.30% |
FGOMX Strategic Advisers Fidelity Emerging Markets Fund | 5.03% | 34.20% | 7.88% | 12.23% | -22.45% | -0.19% | 22.10% | 22.25% | -4.83% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FEMKX achieves a 0.94% return, which is significantly lower than FGOMX's 5.03% return.
FEMKX
- 1D
- 3.47%
- 1M
- -7.65%
- YTD
- 0.94%
- 6M
- 4.32%
- 1Y
- 32.96%
- 3Y*
- 14.61%
- 5Y*
- 2.97%
- 10Y*
- 9.95%
FGOMX
- 1D
- 3.27%
- 1M
- -7.83%
- YTD
- 5.03%
- 6M
- 9.51%
- 1Y
- 35.47%
- 3Y*
- 17.52%
- 5Y*
- 4.67%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FEMKX vs. FGOMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FEMKX has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than FGOMX's 0.25% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FEMKX vs. FGOMX — Risk / Return Rank
FEMKX
FGOMX
FEMKX vs. FGOMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Emerging Markets (FEMKX) and Strategic Advisers Fidelity Emerging Markets Fund (FGOMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FEMKX | FGOMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.74 | 2.15 | -0.41 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.35 | 2.95 | -0.60 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.42 | -0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.53 | 2.80 | -0.27 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.48 | 11.09 | -1.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FEMKX | FGOMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.74 | 2.15 | -0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 | 0.28 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.48 | -0.18 |
Correlation
The correlation between FEMKX and FGOMX is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FEMKX vs. FGOMX - Dividend Comparison
FEMKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%, less than FGOMX's 2.06% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEMKX Fidelity Emerging Markets | 0.05% | 0.05% | 0.65% | 1.11% | 0.77% | 6.00% | 1.39% | 1.71% | 0.83% | 0.08% | 0.67% | 0.51% |
FGOMX Strategic Advisers Fidelity Emerging Markets Fund | 2.06% | 2.17% | 2.40% | 2.83% | 2.42% | 4.63% | 0.73% | 2.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FEMKX vs. FGOMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FEMKX drawdown since its inception was -71.14%, which is greater than FGOMX's maximum drawdown of -40.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEMKX and FGOMX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FEMKX | FGOMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.14% | -40.14% | -31.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.00% | -12.77% | -0.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.88% | -38.04% | -2.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.24% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.98% | -9.91% | -0.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.06% | -13.59% | -12.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.47% | 3.60% | -0.13% |
Volatility
FEMKX vs. FGOMX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Emerging Markets (FEMKX) has a higher volatility of 10.00% compared to Strategic Advisers Fidelity Emerging Markets Fund (FGOMX) at 8.85%. This indicates that FEMKX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FGOMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FEMKX | FGOMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.00% | 8.85% | +1.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.52% | 13.29% | +1.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.57% | 20.42% | -0.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.53% | 17.45% | +1.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.44% | 19.16% | -0.72% |