PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FEMG vs. TPLC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FEMG vs. TPLC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Growth ETF (FEMG) and Timothy Plan Fund Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core Fund (TPLC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


FEMG

1D
-0.84%
1M
3.74%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TPLC

1D
-0.12%
1M
1.66%
YTD
8.78%
6M
7.78%
1Y
12.59%
3Y*
13.91%
5Y*
8.22%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEMG vs. TPLC - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FEMG and TPLC is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2026

0.70

FEMG vs. TPLC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FEMG
TPLC

Industrials

26.5%
23.2%

Technology

24.0%
16.7%

Consumer Cyclical

17.4%
9.0%

Healthcare

12.6%
9.3%

Financial Services

6.0%
11.8%

Energy

3.3%
8.2%

Utilities

2.9%
11.6%

Communication Services

2.7%
0.2%

Real Estate

1.8%
0.3%

Consumer Defensive

1.4%
3.8%

Basic Materials

0.7%
5.9%

Industrials

FEMG
26.5%
TPLC
23.2%

Technology

FEMG
24.0%
TPLC
16.7%

Consumer Cyclical

FEMG
17.4%
TPLC
9.0%

Healthcare

FEMG
12.6%
TPLC
9.3%

Financial Services

FEMG
6.0%
TPLC
11.8%

Energy

FEMG
3.3%
TPLC
8.2%

Utilities

FEMG
2.9%
TPLC
11.6%

Communication Services

FEMG
2.7%
TPLC
0.2%

Real Estate

FEMG
1.8%
TPLC
0.3%

Consumer Defensive

FEMG
1.4%
TPLC
3.8%

Basic Materials

FEMG
0.7%
TPLC
5.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FEMG vs. TPLC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEMG

TPLC
TPLC Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
TPLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TPLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
TPLC Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
TPLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
TPLC Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEMG vs. TPLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Growth ETF (FEMG) and Timothy Plan Fund Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core Fund (TPLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FEMG vs. TPLC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FEMGTPLCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

4.78

0.56

+4.23

Drawdowns

FEMG vs. TPLC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEMG drawdown since its inception was -3.29%, smaller than the maximum TPLC drawdown of -38.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEMG and TPLC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FEMGTPLCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.29%

-38.02%

+34.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.18%

-0.12%

-1.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.96%

-5.29%

+4.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.13%

Volatility

FEMG vs. TPLC - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FEMGTPLCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.29%

11.50%

+0.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.29%

16.14%

-3.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.29%

19.89%

-7.60%

FEMG vs. TPLC - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEMG has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than TPLC's 0.52% expense ratio.


Dividends

FEMG vs. TPLC - Dividend Comparison

FEMG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TPLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
FEMG
Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Growth ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TPLC
Timothy Plan Fund Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core Fund
0.84%0.89%0.88%0.89%1.06%0.61%0.81%0.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


FEMG and TPLC have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FEMG is cheaper at 0.23% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FEMG is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for TPLC.

TPLC has the higher dividend yield at 0.84%, compared with 0.00% for FEMG.

They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Timothy Plan. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for FEMG and 0.52% for TPLC.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FEMG and TPLC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer