FEMG vs. QMID

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

FEMG (Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Growth ETF) and QMID (WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Fund) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. FEMG is actively managed, while QMID is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FEMG charges 0.23%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for QMID.

Performance

FEMG vs. QMID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Growth ETF (FEMG) and WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Fund (QMID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

FEMG

• 1D: 0.82%
• 1M: 1.31%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QMID

• 1D: 0.91%
• 1M: 1.66%
• YTD: 2.17%
• 6M: -0.27%
• 1Y: 8.61%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEMG vs. QMID - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
FEMG Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Growth ETF	3.75%
QMID WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Fund	2.63%

Correlation

The correlation between FEMG and QMID is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2026	0.80

FEMG vs. QMID - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FEMG	QMID
Industrials	27.7%	25.0%
Technology	22.4%	15.8%
Consumer Cyclical	18.1%	15.9%
Healthcare	12.1%	14.1%
Financial Services	6.5%	12.0%
Energy	3.7%	3.2%
Utilities	2.7%	-
Communication Services	2.7%	3.2%
Consumer Defensive	1.7%	7.5%
Real Estate	1.6%	-
Basic Materials	0.6%	2.2%

Return for Risk

FEMG vs. QMID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEMG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

QMID

QMID Risk / Return Rank: 19
QMID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
QMID Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
QMID Omega Ratio Rank: 17
QMID Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
QMID Martin Ratio Rank: 24

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEMG vs. QMID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Growth ETF (FEMG) and WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Fund (QMID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FEMG	QMID	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	0.57	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	0.93	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.10	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	0.81	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	2.73	—

Drawdowns

FEMG vs. QMID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEMG drawdown since its inception was -4.66%, smaller than the maximum QMID drawdown of -24.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEMG and QMID.

Drawdown Indicators

	FEMG	QMID	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.66%	-24.42%	+19.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-10.67%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.89%	-2.05%	+0.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.37%	-5.40%	+4.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.16%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FEMG	QMID	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.99%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	10.79%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.54%	15.16%	+1.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.54%	18.43%	-1.89%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.54%	18.43%	-1.89%

FEMG vs. QMID - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEMG has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than QMID's 0.38% expense ratio.

Dividends

FEMG vs. QMID - Dividend Comparison

FEMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%, less than QMID's 0.50% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
FEMG Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Growth ETF	0.10%	0.00%	0.00%
QMID WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Fund	0.50%	0.51%	1.16%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FEMG and QMID in my portfolio?

FEMG and QMID have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FEMG or QMID?

On fees, FEMG is cheaper at 0.23% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FEMG or QMID?

FEMG is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for QMID.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FEMG or QMID?

QMID has the higher dividend yield at 0.50%, compared with 0.10% for FEMG.

What is the main difference between FEMG and QMID?

They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for FEMG and 0.38% for QMID.