FEMG vs. FDVV

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

FEMG (Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Growth ETF) and FDVV (Fidelity High Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FEMG is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity, while FDVV is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Fidelity Core Dividend Index. FEMG is actively managed, while FDVV is passively managed. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FEMG charges 0.23%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for FDVV.

Performance

FEMG vs. FDVV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Growth ETF (FEMG) and Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

FEMG

• 1D: 0.82%
• 1M: 1.31%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FDVV

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: 0.49%
• YTD: 8.46%
• 6M: 7.70%
• 1Y: 21.26%
• 3Y*: 19.93%
• 5Y*: 13.59%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEMG vs. FDVV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
FEMG Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Growth ETF	3.75%
FDVV Fidelity High Dividend ETF	4.38%

Correlation

The correlation between FEMG and FDVV is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2026	0.67

FEMG vs. FDVV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FEMG	FDVV
Industrials	27.7%	3.0%
Technology	22.4%	30.5%
Consumer Cyclical	18.1%	13.6%
Healthcare	12.1%	3.0%
Financial Services	6.5%	17.0%
Energy	3.7%	-
Utilities	2.7%	8.6%
Communication Services	2.7%	3.6%
Consumer Defensive	1.7%	10.7%
Real Estate	1.6%	9.9%
Basic Materials	0.6%	-

Return for Risk

FEMG vs. FDVV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEMG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FDVV

FDVV Risk / Return Rank: 66
FDVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
FDVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
FDVV Omega Ratio Rank: 74
FDVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
FDVV Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEMG vs. FDVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Growth ETF (FEMG) and Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FEMG	FDVV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.11	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.95	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.39	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.30	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	9.49	—

Drawdowns

FEMG vs. FDVV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEMG drawdown since its inception was -4.66%, smaller than the maximum FDVV drawdown of -40.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEMG and FDVV.

Drawdown Indicators

	FEMG	FDVV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.66%	-40.25%	+35.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-9.30%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-15.90%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-20.18%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.89%	-1.25%	-0.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.37%	-3.79%	+2.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.25%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FEMG	FDVV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.97%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	8.25%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.54%	10.14%	+6.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.54%	14.73%	+1.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.54%	16.97%	-0.43%

FEMG vs. FDVV - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEMG has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than FDVV's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

FEMG vs. FDVV - Dividend Comparison

FEMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%, less than FDVV's 2.86% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
FDVV Fidelity High Dividend ETF	2.86%	2.89%	2.94%	3.77%	3.44%	2.70%	3.19%	3.93%	4.05%	3.66%	1.04%
FEMG Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Growth ETF	0.10%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FEMG and FDVV in my portfolio?

FEMG and FDVV have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FEMG or FDVV?

On fees, FEMG is cheaper at 0.23% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FEMG or FDVV?

FEMG is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for FDVV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FEMG or FDVV?

FDVV has the higher dividend yield at 2.86%, compared with 0.10% for FEMG.

What is the main difference between FEMG and FDVV?

FEMG is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while FDVV is Large Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for FEMG and 0.29% for FDVV.