FEME.L vs. FGLS.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Emerging Markets Quality Income UCITS ETF USD Inc (FEME.L) and Fidelity Sustainable Research Enhanced Global Equity UCITS ETF Acc (FGLS.L).
FEME.L and FGLS.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FEME.L is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the Fidelity Emerging Markets Quality Income Index. It was launched on Oct 30, 2017. FGLS.L is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI NR USD. It was launched on May 27, 2020. Both FEME.L and FGLS.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
FEME.L vs. FGLS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FEME.L vs. FGLS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEME.L Fidelity Emerging Markets Quality Income UCITS ETF USD Inc | 1.24% | 24.79% | 1.22% | 11.70% | -27.08% | 1.89% | 26.84% |
FGLS.L Fidelity Sustainable Research Enhanced Global Equity UCITS ETF Acc | -5.78% | 18.37% | 17.92% | 23.79% | -19.08% | 22.52% | 22.23% |
Different Trading Currencies
FEME.L is traded in USD, while FGLS.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the FGLS.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FEME.L achieves a 1.24% return, which is significantly higher than FGLS.L's -5.78% return.
FEME.L
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- -10.61%
- YTD
- 1.24%
- 6M
- 3.89%
- 1Y
- 24.38%
- 3Y*
- 10.90%
- 5Y*
- -0.08%
- 10Y*
- —
FGLS.L
- 1D
- 0.96%
- 1M
- -6.53%
- YTD
- -5.78%
- 6M
- -2.72%
- 1Y
- 15.15%
- 3Y*
- 14.97%
- 5Y*
- 8.76%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FEME.L vs. FGLS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
FEME.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than FGLS.L's 0.35% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FEME.L vs. FGLS.L — Risk / Return Rank
FEME.L
FGLS.L
FEME.L vs. FGLS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Emerging Markets Quality Income UCITS ETF USD Inc (FEME.L) and Fidelity Sustainable Research Enhanced Global Equity UCITS ETF Acc (FGLS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FEME.L | FGLS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.46 | 1.05 | +0.40 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.96 | 1.52 | +0.44 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.22 | +0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.02 | 1.22 | +0.81 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.09 | 5.77 | +1.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FEME.L | FGLS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.46 | 1.05 | +0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.00 | 0.57 | -0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.19 | 0.80 | -0.60 |
Correlation
The correlation between FEME.L and FGLS.L is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
FEME.L vs. FGLS.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither FEME.L nor FGLS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
FEME.L vs. FGLS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FEME.L drawdown since its inception was -41.21%, which is greater than FGLS.L's maximum drawdown of -26.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEME.L and FGLS.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FEME.L | FGLS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.21% | -19.90% | -21.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.45% | -10.56% | -0.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.21% | -19.90% | -21.31% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.24% | -6.09% | -5.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.56% | -3.23% | -14.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.26% | 2.48% | +0.78% |
Volatility
FEME.L vs. FGLS.L - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Emerging Markets Quality Income UCITS ETF USD Inc (FEME.L) has a higher volatility of 6.96% compared to Fidelity Sustainable Research Enhanced Global Equity UCITS ETF Acc (FGLS.L) at 4.53%. This indicates that FEME.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FGLS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FEME.L | FGLS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.96% | 4.53% | +2.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.33% | 8.67% | +2.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.69% | 15.76% | +0.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.68% | 15.43% | +1.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.60% | 15.66% | +3.94% |