PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FEME.L vs. FFEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FEME.L vs. FFEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Emerging Markets Quality Income UCITS ETF USD Inc (FEME.L) and Fidelity Fundamental Emerging Markets ETF (FFEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FEME.L vs. FFEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEME.L achieves a 5.47% return, which is significantly lower than FFEM's 6.88% return.


FEME.L

1D
4.18%
1M
-4.88%
YTD
5.47%
6M
7.81%
1Y
28.28%
3Y*
12.43%
5Y*
0.74%
10Y*

FFEM

1D
0.79%
1M
-6.99%
YTD
6.88%
6M
12.73%
1Y
42.16%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FEME.L vs. FFEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEME.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than FFEM's 0.60% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FEME.L vs. FFEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEME.L
FEME.L Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
FEME.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEME.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEME.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
FEME.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEME.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

FFEM
FFEM Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
FFEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFEM Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
FFEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFEM Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEME.L vs. FFEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Emerging Markets Quality Income UCITS ETF USD Inc (FEME.L) and Fidelity Fundamental Emerging Markets ETF (FFEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FEME.LFFEMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.64

1.91

-0.27

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.23

2.54

-0.31

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.37

-0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.52

3.17

-0.65

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.84

12.03

-3.18

FEME.L vs. FFEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEME.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is comparable to the FFEM Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEME.L and FFEM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FEME.LFFEMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.64

1.91

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

1.56

-1.33

Correlation

The correlation between FEME.L and FFEM is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

FEME.L vs. FFEM - Dividend Comparison

FEME.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FFEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%.


Drawdowns

FEME.L vs. FFEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEME.L drawdown since its inception was -41.21%, which is greater than FFEM's maximum drawdown of -16.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEME.L and FFEM.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FEME.LFFEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.21%

-16.29%

-24.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.44%

-13.57%

+2.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.53%

-9.03%

+1.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.55%

-2.46%

-15.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.20%

3.58%

-0.38%

Volatility

FEME.L vs. FFEM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Emerging Markets Quality Income UCITS ETF USD Inc (FEME.L) is 6.91%, while Fidelity Fundamental Emerging Markets ETF (FFEM) has a volatility of 10.69%. This indicates that FEME.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FFEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FEME.LFFEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.91%

10.69%

-3.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.03%

16.76%

-4.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.16%

22.16%

-5.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.78%

21.11%

-4.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.66%

21.11%

-1.45%