PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FEMD vs. RNIN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FEMD vs. RNIN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Eagle Mid Cap Equity ETF (FEMD) and Bushido Capital US SMID Cap Equity ETF (RNIN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


FEMD

1D
0.53%
1M
3.25%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

RNIN

1D
-1.25%
1M
1.27%
YTD
15.93%
6M
14.64%
1Y
28.56%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEMD vs. RNIN - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FEMD and RNIN is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2026

0.46

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FEMD vs. RNIN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEMD

RNIN
RNIN Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
RNIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RNIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
RNIN Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
RNIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
RNIN Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEMD vs. RNIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Eagle Mid Cap Equity ETF (FEMD) and Bushido Capital US SMID Cap Equity ETF (RNIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FEMD vs. RNIN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FEMDRNINDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.93

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

1.78

-1.06

Drawdowns

FEMD vs. RNIN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEMD drawdown since its inception was -11.51%, which is greater than RNIN's maximum drawdown of -5.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEMD and RNIN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FEMDRNINDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.51%

-5.70%

-5.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.06%

-2.55%

+2.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.41%

-1.24%

-2.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.61%

Volatility

FEMD vs. RNIN - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FEMDRNINDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.10%

14.87%

+5.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.10%

14.97%

+5.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.10%

14.97%

+5.13%

FEMD vs. RNIN - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEMD has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than RNIN's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

FEMD vs. RNIN - Dividend Comparison

FEMD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RNIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%.


Frequently Asked Questions


FEMD and RNIN have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FEMD is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FEMD is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for RNIN.

RNIN has the higher dividend yield at 0.76%, compared with 0.00% for FEMD.

They also come from different issuers: First Eagle and Bushido. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for FEMD and 0.68% for RNIN.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FEMD and RNIN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer