FEMD.L vs. AVEM.L

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

FEMD.L (Fidelity Emerging Markets Quality Income UCITS ETF) and AVEM.L (Avantis Emerging Markets Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds. FEMD.L is passively managed, while AVEM.L is actively managed. Over the past year, FEMD.L returned 53.50% vs 43.37% for AVEM.L. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FEMD.L charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for AVEM.L.

Performance

FEMD.L vs. AVEM.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Fidelity Emerging Markets Quality Income UCITS ETF (FEMD.L) and Avantis Emerging Markets Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc (AVEM.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

FEMD.L is traded in GBP, while AVEM.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the AVEM.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEMD.L achieves a 34.68% return, which is significantly higher than AVEM.L's 22.97% return.

FEMD.L

• 1D: -0.79%
• 1M: 5.03%
• YTD: 34.68%
• 6M: 35.25%
• 1Y: 53.50%
• 3Y*: 23.98%
• 5Y*: 9.31%
• 10Y*: —

AVEM.L

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: 4.17%
• YTD: 22.97%
• 6M: 24.15%
• 1Y: 43.37%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEMD.L vs. AVEM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FEMD.L Fidelity Emerging Markets Quality Income UCITS ETF	34.68%	19.94%
AVEM.L Avantis Emerging Markets Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc	22.97%	20.23%

Correlation

The correlation between FEMD.L and AVEM.L is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.78
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 2025	0.78

The correlation between FEMD.L and AVEM.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

FEMD.L vs. AVEM.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FEMD.L	AVEM.L
Technology	48.7%	37.4%
Financial Services	17.6%	19.9%
Consumer Cyclical	9.5%	9.0%
Industrials	7.4%	8.8%
Basic Materials	4.8%	6.1%
Energy	3.0%	3.7%
Communication Services	2.4%	5.4%
Consumer Defensive	2.0%	3.0%
Utilities	1.8%	1.4%
Healthcare	1.7%	3.5%
Real Estate	1.2%	1.9%

Return for Risk

FEMD.L vs. AVEM.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEMD.L

FEMD.L Risk / Return Rank: 93
FEMD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
FEMD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
FEMD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 93
FEMD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
FEMD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 91

AVEM.L

AVEM.L Risk / Return Rank: 69
AVEM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
AVEM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
AVEM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 71
AVEM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
AVEM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEMD.L vs. AVEM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Emerging Markets Quality Income UCITS ETF (FEMD.L) and Avantis Emerging Markets Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc (AVEM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FEMD.L	AVEM.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.06	2.34	+0.72
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.06	3.08	+0.98
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.58	1.43	+0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.04	4.04	+2.00
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	18.67	13.94	+4.73

FEMD.L vs. AVEM.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEMD.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.06, which is higher than the AVEM.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEMD.L and AVEM.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FEMD.L vs. AVEM.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEMD.L drawdown since its inception was -27.56%, which is greater than AVEM.L's maximum drawdown of -13.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEMD.L and AVEM.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	FEMD.L	AVEM.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.56%	-13.78%	-13.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.82%	-10.75%	+1.93%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.37%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.37%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.43%	-4.63%	-0.80%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.24%	-2.15%	-6.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.86%	3.11%	-0.25%

Volatility

FEMD.L vs. AVEM.L - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Emerging Markets Quality Income UCITS ETF (FEMD.L) and Avantis Emerging Markets Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc (AVEM.L) have volatilities of 8.17% and 8.57%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FEMD.L	AVEM.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.17%	8.57%	-0.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.44%	16.28%	-0.84%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.40%	18.68%	-1.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.38%	18.99%	-3.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.85%	18.99%	-1.14%

FEMD.L vs. AVEM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEMD.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than AVEM.L's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

FEMD.L vs. AVEM.L - Dividend Comparison

FEMD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.73%, while AVEM.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
AVEM.L Avantis Emerging Markets Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FEMD.L Fidelity Emerging Markets Quality Income UCITS ETF	2.73%	3.48%	3.75%	3.69%	4.00%	3.26%	2.84%	0.36%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FEMD.L and AVEM.L in my portfolio?

FEMD.L and AVEM.L have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FEMD.L or AVEM.L?

On fees, AVEM.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FEMD.L or AVEM.L?

AVEM.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for FEMD.L.

What is the main difference between FEMD.L and AVEM.L?

They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for FEMD.L and 0.35% for AVEM.L.