AVEM.L vs. AVSG.L
AVEM.L (Avantis Emerging Markets Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc) and AVSG.L (Avantis Global Small Cap Value UCITS ETF USD Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - AVEM.L is a Emerging Markets Equities fund actively managed by Avantis, while AVSG.L is a Small Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Avantis. Both are actively managed. AVEM.L charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for AVSG.L.
Performance
AVEM.L vs. AVSG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
AVEM.L
- 1D
- -1.11%
- 1M
- -2.81%
- YTD
- 16.34%
- 6M
- 18.51%
- 1Y
- 37.78%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AVSG.L
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AVEM.L vs. AVSG.L — Risk / Return Rank
AVEM.L
AVSG.L
AVEM.L vs. AVSG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis Emerging Markets Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc (AVEM.L) and Avantis Global Small Cap Value UCITS ETF USD Acc (AVSG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AVEM.L | AVSG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.89 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.01 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AVEM.L | AVSG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.01 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.91 | — | — |
Drawdowns
AVEM.L vs. AVSG.L - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AVEM.L | AVSG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.87% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.05% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.02% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.11% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.43% | — | — |
Volatility
AVEM.L vs. AVSG.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AVEM.L | AVSG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.97% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.98% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.86% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.86% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.86% | — | — |
AVEM.L vs. AVSG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
AVEM.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than AVSG.L's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
AVEM.L vs. AVSG.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither AVEM.L nor AVSG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, AVEM.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AVEM.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for AVSG.L.
AVEM.L is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while AVSG.L is Small Cap Value Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for AVEM.L and 0.39% for AVSG.L.
Find the right allocation for AVEM.L and AVSG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer