FEM.L vs. IPOL.L
FEM.L (First Trust Emerging Markets AlphaDEX UCITS ETF Acc) and IPOL.L (iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - FEM.L tracks the MSCI EM NR USD while IPOL.L tracks the MSCI Emerging - Poland in Net USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FEM.L returned 7.60%/yr vs 9.34%/yr for IPOL.L. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FEM.L charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for IPOL.L.
Performance
FEM.L vs. IPOL.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
FEM.L is traded in GBp, while IPOL.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IPOL.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FEM.L achieves a 12.02% return, which is significantly lower than IPOL.L's 14.97% return. Over the past 10 years, FEM.L has underperformed IPOL.L with an annualized return of 7.60%, while IPOL.L has yielded a comparatively higher 9.34% annualized return.
FEM.L
- 1D
- -2.28%
- 1M
- -6.20%
- 6M
- 6.01%
- YTD
- 12.02%
- 1Y
- 25.83%
- 3Y*
- 13.86%
- 5Y*
- 6.85%
- 10Y*
- 7.60%
IPOL.L
- 1D
- -1.01%
- 1M
- -4.14%
- 6M
- 12.04%
- YTD
- 14.97%
- 1Y
- 30.48%
- 3Y*
- 26.74%
- 5Y*
- 15.31%
- 10Y*
- 9.34%
FEM.L vs. IPOL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEM.L First Trust Emerging Markets AlphaDEX UCITS ETF Acc | 12.02% | 18.46% | 5.12% | 4.21% | -3.80% | 8.72% | -3.95% | 15.10% | -11.29% | 27.59% |
IPOL.L iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 14.97% | 60.44% | -4.46% | 41.75% | -17.88% | 7.85% | -13.81% | -10.35% | -7.43% | 40.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between FEM.L and IPOL.L is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2013 | 0.52 |
The correlation between FEM.L and IPOL.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FEM.L vs. IPOL.L — Risk / Return Rank
FEM.L
IPOL.L
FEM.L vs. IPOL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Emerging Markets AlphaDEX UCITS ETF Acc (FEM.L) and iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IPOL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FEM.L | IPOL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.22 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.12 | 3.16 | -0.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.81 | 7.17 | +2.65 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FEM.L vs. IPOL.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FEM.L drawdown since its inception was -54.05%, roughly equal to the maximum IPOL.L drawdown of -56.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEM.L and IPOL.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FEM.L | IPOL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.05% | -56.74% | +2.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.24% | -9.60% | +1.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.83% | -19.63% | +1.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.83% | -46.45% | +28.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.42% | -56.74% | +21.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.24% | -4.14% | -4.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.73% | -21.55% | +3.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.63% | 4.24% | -1.61% |
Volatility
FEM.L vs. IPOL.L - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Emerging Markets AlphaDEX UCITS ETF Acc (FEM.L) has a higher volatility of 6.59% compared to iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IPOL.L) at 5.06%. This indicates that FEM.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IPOL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FEM.L | IPOL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.59% | 5.06% | +1.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.72% | 18.08% | -4.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.02% | 23.64% | -6.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.31% | 27.89% | -11.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.67% | 25.84% | -7.17% |
FEM.L vs. IPOL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
FEM.L has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than IPOL.L's 0.74% expense ratio.
Dividends
FEM.L vs. IPOL.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither FEM.L nor IPOL.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
FEM.L and IPOL.L have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IPOL.L is cheaper at 0.74% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IPOL.L is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FEM.L.
FEM.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD, while IPOL.L tracks MSCI Emerging - Poland in Net USD. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for FEM.L and 0.74% for IPOL.L.
Find the right allocation for FEM.L and IPOL.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer