FELV vs. WMFFX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FELV (Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Value ETF) and WMFFX (Washington Mutual Investors Fund Class F-2) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. FELV is actively managed, while WMFFX is passively managed. Over the past year, FELV returned 29.77% vs 17.77% for WMFFX. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FELV charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.37%/yr for WMFFX.

Performance

FELV vs. WMFFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Value ETF (FELV) and Washington Mutual Investors Fund Class F-2 (WMFFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FELV achieves a 14.72% return, which is significantly higher than WMFFX's 5.96% return.

FELV

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 4.99%
• YTD: 14.72%
• 6M: 15.52%
• 1Y: 29.77%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

WMFFX

• 1D: 0.39%
• 1M: 2.81%
• YTD: 5.96%
• 6M: 6.10%
• 1Y: 17.77%
• 3Y*: 18.31%
• 5Y*: 12.04%
• 10Y*: 13.00%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FELV vs. WMFFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
FELV Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Value ETF	14.72%	15.80%	15.89%	7.19%
WMFFX Washington Mutual Investors Fund Class F-2	5.96%	17.42%	19.24%	4.92%

Correlation

The correlation between FELV and WMFFX is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2023	0.86

The correlation between FELV and WMFFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FELV vs. WMFFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FELV

FELV Risk / Return Rank: 84
FELV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
FELV Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
FELV Omega Ratio Rank: 83
FELV Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
FELV Martin Ratio Rank: 87

WMFFX

WMFFX Risk / Return Rank: 39
WMFFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
WMFFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
WMFFX Omega Ratio Rank: 38
WMFFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
WMFFX Martin Ratio Rank: 46

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FELV vs. WMFFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Value ETF (FELV) and Washington Mutual Investors Fund Class F-2 (WMFFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FELV	WMFFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.79	1.80	+1.00
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.93	2.56	+1.37
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.51	1.33	+0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.36	2.21	+2.15
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	18.85	9.58	+9.27
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FELV vs. WMFFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FELV Sharpe Ratio is 2.79, which is higher than the WMFFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FELV and WMFFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FELV	WMFFX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.79	1.80	+1.00
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.86	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.80	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.65	0.60	+1.04

Drawdowns

FELV vs. WMFFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FELV drawdown since its inception was -16.08%, smaller than the maximum WMFFX drawdown of -47.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FELV and WMFFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FELV	WMFFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.08%	-47.21%	+31.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.85%	-8.36%	+1.51%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-14.64%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-18.53%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.63%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.07%	-5.36%	+3.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.58%	1.93%	-0.35%

Volatility

FELV vs. WMFFX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Value ETF (FELV) has a higher volatility of 2.79% compared to Washington Mutual Investors Fund Class F-2 (WMFFX) at 2.42%. This indicates that FELV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WMFFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FELV	WMFFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.79%	2.42%	+0.37%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.88%	7.89%	-0.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.72%	10.32%	+0.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.40%	14.11%	-0.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.40%	16.33%	-2.93%

FELV vs. WMFFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FELV has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than WMFFX's 0.37% expense ratio.

Dividends

FELV vs. WMFFX - Dividend Comparison

FELV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, less than WMFFX's 9.74% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FELV Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Value ETF	1.51%	1.67%	2.02%	0.04%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
WMFFX Washington Mutual Investors Fund Class F-2	9.74%	10.28%	10.27%	5.92%	6.53%	6.24%	3.26%	6.33%	4.59%	7.43%	6.56%	6.44%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FELV and WMFFX in my portfolio?

FELV and WMFFX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FELV or WMFFX?

FELV has higher volatility (2.79%) compared to WMFFX (2.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FELV dropped -16.08% vs WMFFX's -47.21%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FELV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.79 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.