FELCX vs. SCMIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class C (FELCX) and Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund Institutional 2 Class (SCMIX).
FELCX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Dec 27, 2000. SCMIX is an actively managed fund by Columbia. It was launched on Nov 30, 2001.
Performance
FELCX vs. SCMIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FELCX vs. SCMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FELCX Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class C | 0.09% | 43.80% | 42.66% | 73.83% | -35.56% | 56.29% | 42.50% | 62.54% | -13.48% | 33.04% |
SCMIX Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund Institutional 2 Class | 0.24% | 37.73% | 27.06% | 44.68% | -30.96% | 39.37% | 44.85% | 54.60% | -7.81% | 34.46% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FELCX achieves a 0.09% return, which is significantly lower than SCMIX's 0.24% return. Over the past 10 years, FELCX has outperformed SCMIX with an annualized return of 28.65%, while SCMIX has yielded a comparatively lower 22.57% annualized return.
FELCX
- 1D
- -4.25%
- 1M
- -10.06%
- YTD
- 0.09%
- 6M
- 7.78%
- 1Y
- 75.85%
- 3Y*
- 37.03%
- 5Y*
- 26.84%
- 10Y*
- 28.65%
SCMIX
- 1D
- -2.98%
- 1M
- -9.31%
- YTD
- 0.24%
- 6M
- 5.30%
- 1Y
- 58.63%
- 3Y*
- 29.65%
- 5Y*
- 16.87%
- 10Y*
- 22.57%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FELCX vs. SCMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FELCX has a 1.76% expense ratio, which is higher than SCMIX's 0.89% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FELCX vs. SCMIX — Risk / Return Rank
FELCX
SCMIX
FELCX vs. SCMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class C (FELCX) and Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund Institutional 2 Class (SCMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FELCX | SCMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.90 | 1.91 | -0.02 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.51 | 2.48 | +0.03 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.35 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.08 | 3.58 | +0.50 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.49 | 13.59 | +1.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FELCX | SCMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.90 | 1.91 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 | 0.65 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 | 0.87 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 0.60 | -0.23 |
Correlation
The correlation between FELCX and SCMIX is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FELCX vs. SCMIX - Dividend Comparison
FELCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.34%, more than SCMIX's 7.91% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FELCX Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class C | 8.34% | 8.35% | 8.97% | 4.24% | 4.07% | 4.95% | 5.13% | 0.93% | 22.41% | 10.39% | 0.14% | 11.27% |
SCMIX Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund Institutional 2 Class | 7.91% | 7.93% | 12.11% | 4.52% | 8.08% | 10.45% | 9.38% | 10.47% | 11.30% | 10.48% | 7.88% | 10.40% |
Drawdowns
FELCX vs. SCMIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FELCX drawdown since its inception was -72.55%, which is greater than SCMIX's maximum drawdown of -50.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FELCX and SCMIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FELCX | SCMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.55% | -50.85% | -21.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.11% | -14.88% | -2.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.47% | -37.18% | -9.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.47% | -37.18% | -9.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.71% | -11.91% | -2.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.72% | -9.47% | -14.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.51% | 3.91% | +0.60% |
Volatility
FELCX vs. SCMIX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class C (FELCX) has a higher volatility of 10.51% compared to Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund Institutional 2 Class (SCMIX) at 9.50%. This indicates that FELCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FELCX | SCMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.51% | 9.50% | +1.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.76% | 21.01% | +3.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.68% | 30.59% | +9.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.96% | 25.96% | +12.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.35% | 25.93% | +8.42% |