FELCX vs. FBGRX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class C (FELCX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX).
FELCX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Dec 27, 2000. FBGRX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Dec 31, 1987.
Performance
FELCX vs. FBGRX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FELCX vs. FBGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FELCX Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class C | 7.22% | 43.80% | 42.66% | 73.83% | -35.56% | 56.29% | 42.50% | 62.54% | -13.48% | 33.04% |
FBGRX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund | -7.12% | 19.91% | 39.77% | 55.61% | -38.45% | 22.64% | 62.20% | 33.43% | 1.02% | 36.01% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FELCX achieves a 7.22% return, which is significantly higher than FBGRX's -7.12% return. Over the past 10 years, FELCX has outperformed FBGRX with an annualized return of 29.54%, while FBGRX has yielded a comparatively lower 19.08% annualized return.
FELCX
- 1D
- 7.12%
- 1M
- -4.53%
- YTD
- 7.22%
- 6M
- 13.91%
- 1Y
- 86.87%
- 3Y*
- 40.21%
- 5Y*
- 27.74%
- 10Y*
- 29.54%
FBGRX
- 1D
- 4.54%
- 1M
- -5.07%
- YTD
- -7.12%
- 6M
- -4.04%
- 1Y
- 26.78%
- 3Y*
- 26.54%
- 5Y*
- 11.74%
- 10Y*
- 19.08%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FELCX vs. FBGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FELCX has a 1.76% expense ratio, which is higher than FBGRX's 0.79% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FELCX vs. FBGRX — Risk / Return Rank
FELCX
FBGRX
FELCX vs. FBGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class C (FELCX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FELCX | FBGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.21 | 1.13 | +1.08 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.82 | 1.73 | +1.09 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.25 | +0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.09 | 2.00 | +3.09 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.20 | 7.92 | +11.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FELCX | FBGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.21 | 1.13 | +1.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 | 0.47 | +0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.86 | 0.81 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 0.65 | -0.27 |
Correlation
The correlation between FELCX and FBGRX is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FELCX vs. FBGRX - Dividend Comparison
FELCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.79%, more than FBGRX's 2.05% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FELCX Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class C | 7.79% | 8.35% | 8.97% | 4.24% | 4.07% | 4.95% | 5.13% | 0.93% | 22.41% | 10.39% | 0.14% | 11.27% |
FBGRX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund | 2.05% | 1.90% | 5.95% | 0.93% | 0.57% | 8.73% | 6.40% | 3.70% | 6.32% | 4.23% | 4.05% | 5.30% |
Drawdowns
FELCX vs. FBGRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FELCX drawdown since its inception was -72.55%, which is greater than FBGRX's maximum drawdown of -58.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FELCX and FBGRX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FELCX | FBGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.55% | -58.64% | -13.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.11% | -13.89% | -3.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.47% | -43.08% | -3.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.47% | -43.08% | -3.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.64% | -8.68% | +0.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.72% | -12.58% | -11.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.54% | 3.51% | +1.03% |
Volatility
FELCX vs. FBGRX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class C (FELCX) has a higher volatility of 12.79% compared to Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX) at 7.83%. This indicates that FELCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FELCX | FBGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.79% | 7.83% | +4.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.67% | 14.08% | +11.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.19% | 24.98% | +15.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.07% | 24.93% | +13.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.42% | 23.63% | +10.79% |