FELC vs. ILCG
FELC (Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Core ETF) and ILCG (iShares Morningstar Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. FELC is actively managed, while ILCG is passively managed. Over the past year, FELC returned 28.58% vs 29.51% for ILCG. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FELC charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for ILCG.
Performance
FELC vs. ILCG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FELC achieves a 11.23% return, which is significantly lower than ILCG's 14.48% return.
FELC
- 1D
- -0.59%
- 1M
- 5.59%
- YTD
- 11.23%
- 6M
- 11.57%
- 1Y
- 28.58%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ILCG
- 1D
- -1.02%
- 1M
- 7.68%
- YTD
- 14.48%
- 6M
- 14.61%
- 1Y
- 29.51%
- 3Y*
- 26.55%
- 5Y*
- 14.95%
- 10Y*
- 18.15%
FELC vs. ILCG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FELC Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Core ETF | 11.23% | 17.09% | 25.25% | 5.68% |
ILCG iShares Morningstar Growth ETF | 14.48% | 16.71% | 32.82% | 4.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between FELC and ILCG is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2023 | 0.93 |
The correlation between FELC and ILCG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
FELC vs. ILCG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FELC
ILCG
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
FELC
ILCG
Communication Services
FELC
ILCG
Financial Services
FELC
ILCG
Consumer Cyclical
FELC
ILCG
Industrials
FELC
ILCG
Healthcare
FELC
ILCG
Energy
FELC
ILCG
Consumer Defensive
FELC
ILCG
Basic Materials
FELC
ILCG
Utilities
FELC
ILCG
Real Estate
FELC
ILCG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FELC vs. ILCG — Risk / Return Rank
FELC
ILCG
FELC vs. ILCG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Core ETF (FELC) and iShares Morningstar Growth ETF (ILCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FELC | ILCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.32 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.16 | 1.89 | +1.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.66 | 6.68 | +7.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FELC | ILCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.41 | 1.82 | +0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.68 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.59 | 0.59 | +1.01 |
Drawdowns
FELC vs. ILCG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FELC drawdown since its inception was -18.59%, smaller than the maximum ILCG drawdown of -52.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FELC and ILCG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FELC | ILCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.59% | -52.98% | +34.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.09% | -15.65% | +6.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.10% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.38% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.38% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.59% | -1.02% | +0.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.91% | -8.22% | +6.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.95% | 4.43% | -2.48% |
Volatility
FELC vs. ILCG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Core ETF (FELC) is 2.78%, while iShares Morningstar Growth ETF (ILCG) has a volatility of 4.40%. This indicates that FELC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ILCG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FELC | ILCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.78% | 4.40% | -1.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.93% | 12.81% | -3.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.90% | 16.31% | -4.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.17% | 22.00% | -6.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.17% | 21.53% | -6.36% |
FELC vs. ILCG - Expense Ratio Comparison
FELC has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than ILCG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FELC vs. ILCG - Dividend Comparison
FELC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, more than ILCG's 0.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FELC Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Core ETF | 0.85% | 0.92% | 1.03% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ILCG iShares Morningstar Growth ETF | 0.40% | 0.47% | 0.50% | 0.69% | 0.75% | 0.34% | 0.28% | 0.54% | 0.81% | 0.89% | 0.95% | 0.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, FELC and ILCG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
ILCG has higher volatility (4.40%) compared to FELC (2.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FELC dropped -18.59% vs ILCG's -52.98%.
On 1-year performance, ILCG leads with 29.51% vs 28.58% for FELC. On fees, ILCG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, FELC has been the lower-risk option at 2.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ILCG has performed better with a 29.51% return vs 28.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ILCG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for FELC.
FELC has the higher dividend yield at 0.85%, compared with 0.40% for ILCG.
They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for FELC and 0.04% for ILCG.
FELC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FELC and ILCG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer