PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FELC vs. FETH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FELC vs. FETH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Core ETF (FELC) and Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FELC achieves a 11.23% return, which is significantly higher than FETH's -39.45% return.


FELC

1D
-0.59%
1M
5.59%
YTD
11.23%
6M
11.57%
1Y
28.58%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FETH

1D
-5.78%
1M
-23.67%
YTD
-39.45%
6M
-42.77%
1Y
-31.75%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FELC vs. FETH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
FELC
Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Core ETF
11.23%17.09%6.65%
FETH
Fidelity Ethereum Fund
-39.45%-11.37%-3.61%

Correlation

The correlation between FELC and FETH is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2024

0.50

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FELC vs. FETH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FELC
FELC Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
FELC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FELC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
FELC Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
FELC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
FELC Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

FETH
FETH Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
FETH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FETH Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
FETH Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
FETH Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
FETH Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FELC vs. FETH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Core ETF (FELC) and Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FELCFETHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

0.97

+0.47

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.16

-0.51

+3.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.66

-0.84

+15.51

FELC vs. FETH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FELC Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is higher than the FETH Sharpe Ratio of -0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FELC and FETH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FELCFETHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.41

-0.47

+2.88

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.59

-0.41

+2.01

Drawdowns

FELC vs. FETH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FELC drawdown since its inception was -18.59%, smaller than the maximum FETH drawdown of -64.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FELC and FETH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FELCFETHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.59%

-64.00%

+45.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.09%

-62.95%

+53.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.59%

-62.95%

+62.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.91%

-32.73%

+30.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.95%

37.82%

-35.87%

Volatility

FELC vs. FETH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Core ETF (FELC) is 2.78%, while Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH) has a volatility of 9.99%. This indicates that FELC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FETH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FELCFETHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.78%

9.99%

-7.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.93%

46.01%

-37.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.90%

68.50%

-56.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.17%

72.27%

-57.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.17%

72.27%

-57.10%

FELC vs. FETH - Expense Ratio Comparison

FELC has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than FETH's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FELC vs. FETH - Dividend Comparison

FELC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, while FETH has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
FELC
Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Core ETF
0.85%0.92%1.03%0.04%
FETH
Fidelity Ethereum Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FELC and FETH have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FETH has higher volatility (9.99%) compared to FELC (2.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FELC dropped -18.59% vs FETH's -64.00%.

On 1-year performance, FELC leads with 28.58% vs -31.75% for FETH. On fees, FETH is cheaper at 0.00% per year. On volatility, FELC has been the lower-risk option at 2.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FELC has performed better with a 28.58% return vs -31.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FETH is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for FELC.

FELC has the higher dividend yield at 0.85%, compared with 0.00% for FETH.

FELC is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while FETH is Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for FELC and 0.00% for FETH.

FELC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FELC and FETH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer