PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FEGE vs. SFGV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FEGE vs. SFGV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Eagle Global Equity ETF (FEGE) and Sequoia Global Value ETF (SFGV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEGE achieves a 5.24% return, which is significantly lower than SFGV's 11.40% return.


FEGE

1D
-0.82%
1M
-2.96%
YTD
5.24%
6M
4.76%
1Y
23.54%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SFGV

1D
-0.26%
1M
0.60%
YTD
11.40%
6M
11.08%
1Y
24.39%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEGE vs. SFGV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
FEGE
First Eagle Global Equity ETF
5.24%34.19%-1.43%
SFGV
Sequoia Global Value ETF
11.40%18.84%0.76%

Correlation

The correlation between FEGE and SFGV is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2024

0.85

The correlation between FEGE and SFGV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

FEGE vs. SFGV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FEGE
SFGV

Technology

16.1%
11.4%

Consumer Defensive

14.8%
8.8%

Healthcare

11.6%
12.7%

Financial Services

11.6%
10.5%

Industrials

9.8%
13.7%

Basic Materials

9.0%
6.0%

Communication Services

8.4%
3.4%

Energy

8.2%
11.4%

Consumer Cyclical

6.5%
15.3%

Real Estate

3.9%
5.9%

Utilities

-

1.0%

Technology

FEGE
16.1%
SFGV
11.4%

Consumer Defensive

FEGE
14.8%
SFGV
8.8%

Healthcare

FEGE
11.6%
SFGV
12.7%

Financial Services

FEGE
11.6%
SFGV
10.5%

Industrials

FEGE
9.8%
SFGV
13.7%

Basic Materials

FEGE
9.0%
SFGV
6.0%

Communication Services

FEGE
8.4%
SFGV
3.4%

Energy

FEGE
8.2%
SFGV
11.4%

Consumer Cyclical

FEGE
6.5%
SFGV
15.3%

Real Estate

FEGE
3.9%
SFGV
5.9%

Utilities

FEGE

-

SFGV
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FEGE vs. SFGV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEGE
FEGE Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
FEGE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEGE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEGE Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
FEGE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEGE Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

SFGV
SFGV Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
SFGV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SFGV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
SFGV Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
SFGV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
SFGV Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEGE vs. SFGV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Eagle Global Equity ETF (FEGE) and Sequoia Global Value ETF (SFGV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FEGESFGVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.37

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.16

2.93

-0.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.24

10.93

-3.69

FEGE vs. SFGV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEGE Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is comparable to the SFGV Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEGE and SFGV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FEGE vs. SFGV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEGE drawdown since its inception was -11.13%, smaller than the maximum SFGV drawdown of -14.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEGE and SFGV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FEGESFGVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.13%

-14.51%

+3.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.96%

-8.36%

-2.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.89%

-1.46%

-4.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.79%

-1.87%

+0.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.26%

2.24%

+1.02%

Volatility

FEGE vs. SFGV - Volatility Comparison

First Eagle Global Equity ETF (FEGE) has a higher volatility of 3.95% compared to Sequoia Global Value ETF (SFGV) at 3.31%. This indicates that FEGE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SFGV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FEGESFGVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.95%

3.31%

+0.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.57%

8.88%

+1.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.70%

11.79%

+0.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.69%

13.25%

+1.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.69%

13.25%

+1.44%

FEGE vs. SFGV - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEGE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SFGV's 0.33% expense ratio.


Dividends

FEGE vs. SFGV - Dividend Comparison

FEGE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.22%, less than SFGV's 2.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
FEGE
First Eagle Global Equity ETF
1.22%1.28%0.00%
SFGV
Sequoia Global Value ETF
2.25%2.52%2.23%

Frequently Asked Questions


FEGE and SFGV have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FEGE has higher volatility (3.95%) compared to SFGV (3.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEGE dropped -11.13% vs SFGV's -14.51%.

On 1-year performance, SFGV leads with 24.39% vs 23.54% for FEGE. On fees, SFGV is cheaper at 0.33% per year. On volatility, SFGV has been the lower-risk option at 3.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SFGV has performed better with a 24.39% return vs 23.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SFGV is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for FEGE.

SFGV has the higher dividend yield at 2.25%, compared with 1.22% for FEGE.

FEGE is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while SFGV is Global Equities. They also come from different issuers: First Eagle and Sequoia. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for FEGE and 0.33% for SFGV.

SFGV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FEGE and SFGV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer