FEGE vs. OAKM
FEGE (First Eagle Global Equity ETF) and OAKM (Oakmark U.S. Large Cap ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, FEGE returned 30.32% vs 15.90% for OAKM. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FEGE charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for OAKM.
Performance
FEGE vs. OAKM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FEGE achieves a 9.57% return, which is significantly higher than OAKM's -0.63% return.
FEGE
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 2.94%
- YTD
- 9.57%
- 6M
- 12.09%
- 1Y
- 30.32%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OAKM
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- -0.28%
- YTD
- -0.63%
- 6M
- 4.16%
- 1Y
- 15.90%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FEGE vs. OAKM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FEGE First Eagle Global Equity ETF | 9.57% | 34.19% | -1.12% |
OAKM Oakmark U.S. Large Cap ETF | -0.63% | 21.46% | -0.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between FEGE and OAKM is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2024 | 0.62 |
The correlation between FEGE and OAKM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FEGE vs. OAKM — Risk / Return Rank
FEGE
OAKM
FEGE vs. OAKM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Eagle Global Equity ETF (FEGE) and Oakmark U.S. Large Cap ETF (OAKM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FEGE | OAKM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.49 | 1.24 | +1.25 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.33 | 1.83 | +1.50 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.22 | +0.21 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.88 | 2.19 | +0.69 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.13 | 5.72 | +4.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FEGE | OAKM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.49 | 1.24 | +1.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.05 | 0.60 | +1.45 |
Drawdowns
FEGE vs. OAKM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FEGE drawdown since its inception was -11.13%, smaller than the maximum OAKM drawdown of -15.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEGE and OAKM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FEGE | OAKM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.13% | -15.24% | +4.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.96% | -7.19% | -3.77% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.02% | -3.09% | +1.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.71% | -2.76% | +1.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.11% | 2.75% | +0.36% |
Volatility
FEGE vs. OAKM - Volatility Comparison
First Eagle Global Equity ETF (FEGE) has a higher volatility of 3.39% compared to Oakmark U.S. Large Cap ETF (OAKM) at 2.79%. This indicates that FEGE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OAKM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FEGE | OAKM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.39% | 2.79% | +0.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.05% | 9.26% | +0.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.25% | 12.91% | -0.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.62% | 16.49% | -1.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.62% | 16.49% | -1.87% |
FEGE vs. OAKM - Expense Ratio Comparison
FEGE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than OAKM's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
FEGE vs. OAKM - Dividend Comparison
FEGE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%, more than OAKM's 0.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
FEGE First Eagle Global Equity ETF | 1.17% | 1.28% | 0.00% |
OAKM Oakmark U.S. Large Cap ETF | 0.67% | 0.67% | 0.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FEGE and OAKM have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FEGE has higher volatility (3.39%) compared to OAKM (2.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEGE dropped -11.13% vs OAKM's -15.24%.
On 1-year performance, FEGE leads with 30.32% vs 15.90% for OAKM. On fees, FEGE is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, OAKM has been the lower-risk option at 2.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FEGE has performed better with a 30.32% return vs 15.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FEGE is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for OAKM.
FEGE has the higher dividend yield at 1.17%, compared with 0.67% for OAKM.
They also come from different issuers: First Eagle and Oakmark. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for FEGE and 0.59% for OAKM.
FEGE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FEGE and OAKM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer