FEDUX vs. QDVBX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FEDUX (Fidelity Education Income Fund) and QDVBX (Fisher Investments Institutional Group ESG Fixed Income Fund for Retirement Plans) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds. Over the past 5 years, FEDUX returned -0.41%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for QDVBX. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FEDUX charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for QDVBX.

Performance

FEDUX vs. QDVBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Education Income Fund (FEDUX) and Fisher Investments Institutional Group ESG Fixed Income Fund for Retirement Plans (QDVBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

FEDUX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.14%
• YTD: 0.35%
• 6M: 0.52%
• 1Y: 3.99%
• 3Y*: 2.62%
• 5Y*: -0.41%
• 10Y*: —

QDVBX

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: 0.23%
• YTD: 0.00%
• 6M: -0.11%
• 1Y: 4.80%
• 3Y*: 4.32%
• 5Y*: 0.08%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEDUX vs. QDVBX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FEDUX Fidelity Education Income Fund	0.35%	6.40%	-0.29%	1.62%	-8.38%	-1.27%
QDVBX Fisher Investments Institutional Group ESG Fixed Income Fund for Retirement Plans	-0.00%	7.64%	1.62%	6.37%	-14.31%	0.41%

Correlation

The correlation between FEDUX and QDVBX is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.84
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2021	0.85

The correlation between FEDUX and QDVBX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FEDUX vs. QDVBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEDUX

FEDUX Risk / Return Rank: 36
FEDUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
FEDUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
FEDUX Omega Ratio Rank: 37
FEDUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
FEDUX Martin Ratio Rank: 33

QDVBX

QDVBX Risk / Return Rank: 20
QDVBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
QDVBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
QDVBX Omega Ratio Rank: 19
QDVBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
QDVBX Martin Ratio Rank: 19

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEDUX vs. QDVBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Education Income Fund (FEDUX) and Fisher Investments Institutional Group ESG Fixed Income Fund for Retirement Plans (QDVBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FEDUX	QDVBX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.62	1.29	+0.34
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.68	1.96	+0.72
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.23	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.33	1.65	+0.68
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.46	5.12	+2.34
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FEDUX vs. QDVBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEDUX Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is comparable to the QDVBX Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEDUX and QDVBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FEDUX	QDVBX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.62	1.29	+0.34
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.13	0.01	-0.15
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.14	0.14	-0.28

Drawdowns

FEDUX vs. QDVBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEDUX drawdown since its inception was -12.00%, smaller than the maximum QDVBX drawdown of -19.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEDUX and QDVBX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FEDUX	QDVBX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.00%	-19.86%	+7.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.72%	-3.00%	+1.28%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-2.80%	-5.37%	+2.57%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-12.00%	-19.86%	+7.86%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.44%	-2.09%	-0.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.47%	-6.68%	+0.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.54%	0.96%	-0.42%

Volatility

FEDUX vs. QDVBX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Education Income Fund (FEDUX) is 0.75%, while Fisher Investments Institutional Group ESG Fixed Income Fund for Retirement Plans (QDVBX) has a volatility of 1.27%. This indicates that FEDUX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QDVBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FEDUX	QDVBX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.75%	1.27%	-0.52%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.76%	2.58%	-0.82%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.47%	3.86%	-1.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.13%	6.61%	-3.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.12%	6.23%	-3.11%

FEDUX vs. QDVBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEDUX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than QDVBX's 0.04% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FEDUX vs. QDVBX - Dividend Comparison

FEDUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.39%, more than QDVBX's 3.51% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FEDUX Fidelity Education Income Fund	4.39%	4.43%	0.36%	0.71%	0.00%	0.13%	0.00%
QDVBX Fisher Investments Institutional Group ESG Fixed Income Fund for Retirement Plans	3.51%	3.51%	3.52%	3.66%	2.56%	1.70%	3.28%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FEDUX and QDVBX in my portfolio?

FEDUX and QDVBX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FEDUX or QDVBX?

QDVBX has higher volatility (1.27%) compared to FEDUX (0.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEDUX dropped -12.00% vs QDVBX's -19.86%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FEDUX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.